jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur ([personal profile] jducoeur) wrote 2014-11-13 04:18 pm (UTC)

Then why should prowess with the rapier (for instance) be included in the Laurel, where prowess with rattan not be?

Because The Chivalry Are The Exception. That is, I accept (out of necessity) that the Chivalry simply don't fit in with any neat categorization: they occupy a weird and particular place in the SCA, and yes, they violate attempts to create a nicely consistent system. I simply throw up my hands at that, and try to work around it...

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting