ext_32648 ([identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] jducoeur 2013-08-09 02:05 pm (UTC)

It seems to me, from outside, that the term "mostly-hierarchical" is the killer.

Fitting data that is "mostly" into a structure, is very hard. The advantage of tagging is that it is so unstructured and dynamic.

I'm over-focusing on that term (likely because I have taken a position, and feel like I should advocate for it). But I think you've just torpedoed the idea that there is a Linnean taxonomy good enough to hold everything.

But that creating a dynamic, editable, personal opinion web page that shows the data through a taxonomic lens is also very useful as an additional resource. A resource that should be featured - but may not be controlling.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting