jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur ([personal profile] jducoeur) wrote2014-12-04 02:13 pm
Entry tags:

Baronial Pollings

Just got my polling for the Baronial election in the mail. Apparently, for the election to be valid, they require fully filled-in forms (five separate fields) from 50%+ of all paid members.

By postal mail.

And there is no SASE enclosed.

This plan strikes me as coming dangerously close to the "unrealistic" line, given how hard it is to get people to put anything in the mail these days. (I know too many people who find the whole idea of sending postal mail quaint, since they are doing all their bill-paying online.) I still think Kingdom made a very poor choice in arrogating the election process to itself, but sobeit -- there's not a lot we can do about it.

So: if you are a paid member, *please* be sure to fill out and return your ballot, even if you look at the slates and have the entirely reasonable reaction of, "I don't much care -- they'd all do a good job". It looks like we need a serious get-out-the-vote effort if we're to avoid things getting weird and unfortunate. Spread the word...
dsrtao: dsr as a LEGO minifig (Default)

[personal profile] dsrtao 2014-12-04 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
What happens if the election is invalid?

[identity profile] jtdiii.livejournal.com 2014-12-04 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)
It struck me a while back that one person with a grudge and a bit of cash could game the current system. Just register enough people as members who have no interest and would throw pollings away as junk mail.

I was sorely tempted.

That is also when I decided I was getting too worked up about SCA politics and it was time to take a six month vacation. :)

Besides I approved of the likely Baron...

[identity profile] rufinia.livejournal.com 2014-12-04 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I have reached out to the other candidates about the issue, and I'll have envelopes and stamps with me at every meeting I go to between now and January 15th.

[identity profile] lauradi7.livejournal.com 2014-12-04 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I belong to an organization that requires not only paper ballots in envelopes but the additional complication of writing a signature on the back of the sealed envelope, and sending it to an accountant in Atlanta. I guess in some sense that's still a secret ballot, though, because identifying stuff is on the ballot itself. I was a little startled by the ballot for the baronial election - lots of identifying required.
I am presuming it's OK to send two people's ballots in one envelope.

[identity profile] dreda.livejournal.com 2014-12-05 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Because I simply can't remember - was there an SASE with the last poll?