jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur ([personal profile] jducoeur) wrote2016-11-04 10:27 am

And let's actually hear it for the Mass Pike

On a more positive note, I'd like to compliment the folks with the state highway department -- the transition of the Mass Pike is going better than I would have believed possible.

As it happens, I was actually *on* the Pike during "D-Day" last Friday evening, as they were shutting down the toll booths. (Just happened that I was coming home from Low Company at that hour.) They clearly hit the ground running -- by the time I took the Pike again a couple of days ago, a bunch of the booths were already gone, some key traffic patterns had been rerouted, and despite the dire warnings of, "It's likely to be like a snow storm", traffic was flowing pretty well. The acid test will be Thanksgiving, of course: I'm really curious whether the traditional hour-long backup at Exit 9 finally goes away.

I'm amused by the new fare model. Folks from out of town, be warned that driving into MA is going to hit you with a fair-sized bill in the mail -- the rates aren't crazy, but designed to cost a good deal extra if they have to bill you. And I'm curious: has anybody seen any actual algorithm for the way they've designed the new rates? I've actually been reading the eensy-weensy "this is how much money we just charged you" signs by the side of the road, and the ratios between the various fare classes appear to be *wildly* inconsistent. Like, it was 25/30/60 at one of them, and 30/60/100 at another. I can't find any rhyme or reason to it.

But all that said, it's looking good. It's tricky to compare the new fare model to the old one, since they think completely differently about it, but it *feels* like it's slightly cheaper for those of us with an in-state EZPass, and it's certainly easier and faster. It's a bit squicky from a privacy POV (surely somebody needs to write a murder mystery that involves one spouse tracking another through their highway bills), but it does seem likely to work well...
desireearmfeldt: (Default)

[personal profile] desireearmfeldt 2016-11-04 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I am really uncomfortable with the current trend towards "you can't do basic things like get around town unless you've previously signed up for a thing" (where "thing" could be a T pass or an EZ pass or a Lyft account or whatever).

I see where it makes things more convenient and efficient overall, but it feels like locking up more and more things and forcing everyone to jump through hoops to get into them -- and if you're a stranger or in an emergency or have some technical issue that makes jumping through the hoops difficult, then you're pretty much screwed.

(And, also, if you have to be electronically signed up for everything, then it's real hard to mitigate the surveillance state.)

I dunno. The future is great, and also terrible.

[identity profile] etherial.livejournal.com 2016-11-04 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Hunh. It hadn't occurred to me that they might be charging OOS EZPasses differently. I originally got one from NY since they didn't charge a signup fee.
laurion: (Default)

[personal profile] laurion 2016-11-04 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Toll calculator is at https://www.ezdrivema.com/TollCalculator and will show the differences between ma transponder, oos transponder, and no transponder.

My understanding from WBUR is that there is a 6 month grace window for those with no transponder.

For what it is worth, I had a NY transponder from back when it was FastLane and Citizens Bank took an extra leg just for you to -have- a transponder, forget the usage billing. The MA ezpass website was a bust for me to get MA transponders, but it was only a moment of work at the EZ Pass physical location.
laurion: (Default)

[personal profile] laurion 2016-11-04 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, and the transponder tracking has been an element in many different TV shows already (Law and Order, Sherlock leaping to mind, but I think all the major crime shows have done it now)... so I wouldn't be surprised to find it's already in a book.