The most important news stories are sometimes the least-covered

[jducoeur]

I just now came across this blog entry, talking about the fact that the Supreme Court is weighing a patent case with serious ramifications today. Apparently, it's being used as a test case for the question of what is "obvious", and they're seriously examining whether the current standards for patents (which have led to the enormous slew of patents in the past couple of decades) are really appropriate.

Neat stuff, and terribly, terribly relevant to the tech industry. For all the concerns that it will cause some chaos (which are probably true), I dearly hope that they wrestle with the problem seriously enough to come up with a better standard. We'll see what happens...

Comments

[jducoeur]

Probably overstated. in that I think there's little chance of more than a modest fraction being challenged. I expect that some patents will quite clearly fail, and won't be worth defending, and others will clearly be solid enough that no one will bother challenging them. Bear in mind that the main premise here is that the current standard is too subjective; what they want to replace it with is something clearer and more objective, if that's possible. If they succeed, then a lot of potential lawsuits become moot.

Also, keep in mind that many patents are simply trash at this point -- filed, but really never used and no one cares enough to defend tham now.

Yes, the cost is considerable -- no question about that. *How* considerable would depend on what they decided. IMO, it's probably worth it, but I am admittedly biased -- I dislike the patent regime enough that I would probably be happier if the whole edifice simply crumbled, rather than what we have now...