jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur ([personal profile] jducoeur) wrote2008-01-07 04:18 pm
Entry tags:

It's the little changes that make you feel old

Emacs now has graphics in it. (Crappy graphics, to be sure, but pictures nonetheless.) Surely this is a sign of the end times...

[identity profile] be-well-lowell.livejournal.com 2008-01-08 05:22 am (UTC)(link)
To be honest, though, the graphics support in emacs is still pretty utilitarian. There's a lot less graphical "glitz" than there is "if emacs support for this feature didn't handle graphics, I would need to find some other program that does."

[identity profile] be-well-lowell.livejournal.com 2008-01-08 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a bit of that, but for me the key would be e-mail. It's a thoroughly "text-y" application, but not being able to handle inline pictures would be a problem for me at this point.

The "operating system in disguise" idea is an increasingly minority view these days, primarily because Emacs is single-threaded. It does a lot of things, but the ones that aren't text-oriented are generally implemented by calling out to an external program -- in a separate task if appropriate.