PSA: Wikipedia Pledge Season
FYI, Wikipedia is on what seems to be turning into an annual fundraising drive. I recommend considering it: while it isn't crucial for everyone, it's certainly becoming an important tool for me, one that I use most days to research one topic or another. So I think of it as shareware -- it's well worth tossing them some money each year for operating expenses. If you use it regularly, give it some thought...
no subject
Just as an example, I recently picked up volume 4 of Absolute Sandman, a series which I followed obsessively in its various incarnations. It includes a 2-page text piece "Timeline of The Sandman" which is *riddled* with errors, inconsistencies, and oversights.
There's just no such thing as an authoritative secondary source. If you didn't look at the originals yourself, you can't trust it completely. IME, wikipedia scores well above average in reliability, but that doesn't mean I give it my complete trust, any more than I trust any secondary source.
no subject
I am still leery but might not consider it the plague anymore.
no subject
no subject
Although it still is not allowed to be used for any educatonal work in schools she says.. Just a basis to look for other information and cites.
no subject