jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur ([personal profile] jducoeur) wrote2005-08-01 04:42 pm

Charity Rant

Yes, I know that you're a good cause -- I wouldn't have sent money to you otherwise. But when you construe that donation as a "membership", and imply that I am therefore somehow obligated to follow it up with the same amount (or, preferably, more) next year, that does nothing to endear your cause to me. And when you begin to send me monthly notices about the latest Urgent Crisis that requires more money from me, I will start to throw out your mail unopened. There are plenty of other deserving charities out there, and some of them are significantly less annoying than you.

(The worst thing about the above is that it applies equally well to a couple *dozen* organizations that are postal-spamming me, effectively colluding to make me thoroughly cynical about the whole concept. When 3/4 of my mail is charities dunning me for cash, it just gets tiresome. Bloody tragedy of the commons...)

Negative donations

[identity profile] metageek.livejournal.com 2005-08-02 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Some people use this effect as a weapon. One guy on Irregular Times has mentioned a couple of times that his $10 donation to the Republican Party has wound up costing them more than $10.