(no subject)

Date: 2012-04-18 12:53 pm (UTC)
jducoeur: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jducoeur
1) What you're talking about is actually more specialized than "is adequate in English" - some of your points are about content, rather than grammar.

Sure -- but they still aren't rocket science. They boil down to "tell the truth and don't brag". Again, I think that's an appropriate minimum bar.

And the truth is that, in this particular case, I consider it possible that the candidate isn't *intentionally* fibbing -- he may just have no idea what he's talking about. But that's almost worse for someone with claims to have a decade-plus of experience. I'm fairly forgiving for someone who is applying entry-level, but if you're claiming to be senior, these rules become very sharp.

In fact, if the recruiter gives you a crappy resume, that reflects on the recruiter more than the candidate.

I have no idea whether this was through a recruiter or not, but that's true.

That said, it just underscores that you can't trust the recruiter to make it all better -- it behooves you to make sure your resume is as good as you can get it. (Remember, I did intentionally phrase this as lessons for readers to learn from...)
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags