jducoeur: (Default)

[personal profile] verdantry gave me five questions. (Thanks!) If you'd like a set (and I know you well enough to have any clue), comment here and I'll give you some to put in your own journal. (Eventually -- coming up with questions can be hard.)

Which of the SCA activities you've dabbled in is something you'd like to get back to, one of these days?

Sooo many to choose from. Hmm...

Rapier? In principle I'd love to, especially given that the state of the art has improved so much, in so many interesting ways, since I was active in it. But realistically it probably isn't going to happen.

Sewing? I've tried and bounced off of that a couple of times, and there is no good reason why I can't learn it more properly. Maybe.

I'm halfway-tempted to say Cooking, since it's been something like a year since I did any real reconstruction. But I think that one is still active, just at a low simmer.

Let's say Archery: I'm quite fond of it, and it's probably the single art where I am most proudly Adequate. I occupy a surprisingly unusual niche in it -- when you look at the scores at Pennsic, I am better than most of the populace, while still being comically amateur compared to the people who actually work at it.

I've been fond of it for most of my life (I picked the sport up as a kid, and have done it now and then throughout my SCA career), but got sidelined a couple of years ago by tendonitis. Now that my shoulder isn't bothering me routinely, it would be interesting to see whether I can get back into the swing of it, once circumstances are easier.

What's the most thoughtful gift someone has given you?

In terms of impact on me, it would probably have to be Inae pointing Kate in my direction ten years ago. But I think that was more for Kate's benefit than mine (to encourage her to have more social life), so "thoughtful" may not be quite right.

Really, I have no idea about most, and would probably come up with a different answer tomorrow. But let's choose a tiny one that affected me profoundly.

It was the SCA 25th Year Celebration down in Texas. I was very much an up-and-comer -- I think I had recently started The Letter of Dance, and was starting to get well-known, but I was still pretty low on the totem pole. I wound up spending most of the event hanging out with what I came to describe as The Dance Cabal, and it was a fairly momentous event for the SCA dance community, because while there were only maybe a dozen of us, we represented a wide swathe of the Society. It was the first time such a diverse bunch of dancemasters had worked together, and we had a blast.

Anyway, part of TFYC was a Laurels' Prize Tournament -- I believe the first one I'd ever encountered. I believe that I didn't enter (I've never been particularly into A&S competitions). But afterwards, Mistress Lizbeth Ravensholm (one of the Society's more serious dance scholars) came up to me and gave me a prize anyway, because she'd been impressed with my dance teaching during the week. It was just a little pewter spoon, but it blew me away, knowing that a leading Laurel from across the country had noticed me like that.

The moral of the story is that the little things can sometimes really matter to someone.

What type of stories tend to really hook you?

I don't think it's entirely consistent, but looking at what I like, there seem to be four common elements:

  • Interesting world-building. That doesn't necessarily mean in the sense of creating a science-fictional or fantasy environment, but I always like to have the sense of depth that comes from someone having thought through the details.
  • Good writing, and specifically richly-drawn characters with motivations that I can understand. (Whether or not I can relate to them.)
  • Thematic depth: a story that means something, on some level.
  • The sense that I am reading a story, dammit, not just a serialized adventure. That means having a beginning, middle and end, and preferably a good chunk of foreshadowing.

I'm amused to note that this list is in order of importance, from least to most -- and also in the order in which they came to matter to me. That gradual shift in priorities goes a long ways to explain why my taste in comics has changed dramatically over the years.

(I've just restarted the epic Inventory The Comics Project. This has been in process for, no shit, 25 years now, but I'm gradually making progress on it, having restarted two days ago after about a two-year hiatus. It's already probably the largest single Querki Space, and has a long ways to go -- I'm currently in "F". I'm sorting all the comics up through around 2007, and breaking them down into "Discard", "Keep Permanently", and "Think About It Again Later". And it's fascinating how many of the comics I adored in college now go straight into the Discard pile, because while they are nerdishly fun, they aren't all that well-written, and they aren't actually stories.)

Tell us your favorite "No shit, there I was" story.

Surprisingly, this is the tricky one. Most of my usual "no shit" stories didn't actually happen to me. (I'm quite fond of telling The Vis Cycle.) And the ones I do tell most often about myself aren't appropriate to post online. (Sometime when this is all over, and we can actually sit down together, and we have half an hour and appropriate beverages, remind me to tell you The Saga of the Trip to Quebec, aka How I Spent My 19th Birthday, aka How I Just Barely Didn't Get Arrested.)

But okay -- let's go way back to the beginning...

No shit, there I was -- at my first Pennsic. I was an innocent in nearly every sense of the word, not yet a year into the Society, and had been invited to camp with The Barony-in-Exile of Branswatch, otherwise affectionately known as The Filthy Greenshirts.

(Yes, we had green shirts, and yes, they were often filthy. Branswatch's claim to fame was the Pennsic Woods Battle. We were led by the late and much-lamented Earl Sir Aelfwine Dunedaine. At the beginning of each Woods Battle, he would cry "Follow me!", and vanish into the woods, with the rest of us trying desperately to keep up behind him. Traditionally, the Midrealm would march down the causeway, mighty warriors that they were -- and we would descend upon them from all around. Filthy Greenshirts made great camo.)

Anyway, back to "there we were"...

It was the middle of Pennsic, and the Midrealm King put out a call for guards for The Mighty Midrealm Camp Gates. Thing was, though, he never said that the guards had to be Middies -- or even vaguely loyal to the Mid. This seemed like a fine opportunity.

So we spent the next day drilling. Our commander in this scheme, James the Fair, drilled us in "Left Face!". And "Right March!". And all sorts of terribly impressive-looking, utterly irrelevant military crap, such that by the end we were clearly the best-drilled, well-trained candidates to "guard" the Midrealm, who were obviously so disciplined that we would never do something like filch the Midrealm's Crown. No, never.

We would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for that meddling kidknight. As we were performing our audition as The Best Guards Ever, one of the Midrealm Chiv happened to wander out, look at us, and pull the watch commander aside. Thing is, Aelfwine wasn't going to let the rest of us have all the fun without him, and he was a wee tad recognizable. So it was back to the lab, to await another night to take over the world.

(Really, that was one heck of a War. It was also, IIRC, the year that we built sturdy sedan chairs, to ferry Aelfwine and Arastorm into Pennsic Great Court, forcing Berowne of Arden to spend a good minute using his Mighty Heraldic Baritone to intone, "Siiit dooown, siiit dooown -- they're not royalty...")

What are you hoping to see come out of the aftermath of the pandemic?

Honestly, what I most want to see is for more of the country to wake up to the fact that cronyism and incompetence at the top is dangerous and deadly, and is what we have right now. Governments regularly get brought down by the death toll from wars; this is going to see a lot more deaths, and most of them could have been avoided by a competent administration.

More positively, though: I'd like to see folks seeing the lesson on the ground here, which is that we're better when we work together. There are so many cynical forces setting us against one another, but when push comes to shove, most people do work together and try to do the right thing, especially when they are given good information. For all the dysfunction at the top, many states (although, sadly, not quite all) are working hard to keep their people safe, and the ones that do so are being recognized for it -- many governors are way more popular than their parties are.

The moral of the story to me is that people still like sane, competent leadership, regardless of party affiliation. I'd dearly love to see that trend continue...

jducoeur: (Default)
Okay -- the stressy deadlines of the week seem to be mostly dealt with, and now I have time to play. So, picking this up in the formulation Niki used (I strongly prefer the less-coercive language):

Let me say something nice about you

Comment to my journal and I'll tell you why I think you're great.

It would be nice if you could copy this in your own journal and do it for other people too.
jducoeur: (Default)
Okay -- the stressy deadlines of the week seem to be mostly dealt with, and now I have time to play. So, picking this up in the formulation Niki used (I strongly prefer the less-coercive language):

Let me say something nice about you

Comment to my journal and I'll tell you why I think you're great.

It would be nice if you could copy this in your own journal and do it for other people too.
jducoeur: (Default)
I've been ignoring the "25 Things" meme, not because it's not interesting (it's my sort of thing) as that I did the mega-version back when that went around. So if anyone is curious, and wasn't here back in 2003 when I posted it, I refer you to the 100 Facts About Me meme...
jducoeur: (Default)
I've been ignoring the "25 Things" meme, not because it's not interesting (it's my sort of thing) as that I did the mega-version back when that went around. So if anyone is curious, and wasn't here back in 2003 when I posted it, I refer you to the 100 Facts About Me meme...
jducoeur: (Default)
Once more, with feeling. The Rules:

1. Leave me a casual comment of no particular significance, like a lyric to your current favorite song, your favorite kind of sandwich,or maybe your favorite game. Any remark, meaningless or not. Or, you know -- indicate you want the 5 questions. In fact any comment you leave to this will get questions. Even if that comment is "No."
2.I will respond by asking you five personal questions so I can get to know you better. Or piss you off. Or see how creative you can be. If I'm lucky all 3 in 1 go. (I have a historically bad track record at asking these questions, but let's see if I can think of them all this time.)
3. Update your LJ with the answers to the questions.
4. Include this explanation and offer to ask someone else questions in your own post.
5. When others respond with a comment, you will ask them five questions.
6. It spawns. Again.


ETA: I'm not going to try to ask the questions in the order requested. One thing I've learned from the last time around is that, if I try to be too organized about it, I never ask anything. So I'm going to accumulate questions as I think of them, and I'll reply to each message when I get to five. So don't be surprised if it takes a while to get to you: it just means I haven't finished all five questions yet.
[livejournal.com profile] mikekn">
1. What is *your* all time favorite game (modern or period)?

Poker -- really, nothing else even comes close. In particular, Dealer's Choice has everything I look for in a game: a combination of a fundamental core that I understand, chaotically shifting details, and a deep social dynamic. In general, I'm a crappy strategist but a decent tactician, so Poker suits my skills decently well.

We've got a monthly table that's been running for something north of ten years now. It remains one of my highlights of the month.

2. What SCA accomplishment (not award) are you most proud of?

Tricky, given the breadth of my interests. Two seem to be about tied, so I'll give both of them. On the one hand, there is "getting a lot of people started in the SCA" -- between the online question-answering and college demos, it's turned out to be one of my real passions. On the other, there is "teaching a lot of people how to enjoy period dancing", which has always been my real focus: not just focusing on authenticity and not just having fun, but showing how the two go hand-in-hand.

3. If given the opportunity, would you serve on the SCA BOD? Why or why not?

Well, the evidence says no -- I've been nominated (some years back), and declined the nomination. There are a variety of reasons why, but it's mostly style and inclination: I always prefer to be in jobs where the lines of responsibility are very clear, and the Board is really very messy in that regard. And I'm one of the more infamous anti-bureaucrats in the Society: my sense of honor would probably lead me to try to clean up and slim the Society's bureaucracy, which in all likelihood wouldn't make *anybody* particularly happy. So in a sense, I'm the Loyal Opposition to the Board; joining it would be a tad unnatural.

That said, I don't rule anything out. Certainly I wouldn't do so *now* -- I have too many personal irons in the fire to be able to give the job the appropriate amount of attention. Someday -- well, who knows. It's possible, but I'd have to convince myself that the job wouldn't make me crazy.

4. Do you feel there is still a place for Masonic orders in the 21st century? Or have they grown outdated?

Very interesting, and fraught question, with a bunch of aspects to it.

On the one hand, I suspect that Masonry As We Know It is basically toast. It is structurally designed to be a very large organization, with a lot of fat that grew up in its heyday, and none of that is easy to shed. This causes structural difficulties that are causing something of a death spiral: there are *far* too many individual Lodges, and they are far too reluctant to merge until it's too late, with the result that most are perpetually teetering. So my guess is that the vast majority of today's Lodges aren't going to survive, and the Grand Lodge system will at best need major rejiggering.

And it can't be denied that some aspects of the organization look old at this point. In particular, the male-only thing just looks kind of odd in the modern world, and I don't think it actually adds anything useful. When you're talking about a club that's nearly 300 years old in its current form, it's not surprising that bits of it look archaic -- society as a whole has moved on.

That said, I think the underlying needs are still there. Masonry as a spiritual outlet is really quite neat -- the use of symbolic ritual to teach moral lessons works well if you take it seriously, hitting a lot of basic buttons in the human psyche. So I think that *something* is likely to survive. It may well mutate considerably; it might not even be Masonry per se in a century. (My "Mysteries" project could yet happen one of these years: that takes many of the core ideas of Masonry, and recasts them in a new form.) But I suspect something will continue on.

5. What SCA History question would you like to see answered?

How has the Society changed demographically over the years, and how does that correlate with the changes in the Corporation? I have a lot of theories in that regard, but it's fairly difficult to tease the answers out...
jducoeur: (Default)
Once more, with feeling. The Rules:

1. Leave me a casual comment of no particular significance, like a lyric to your current favorite song, your favorite kind of sandwich,or maybe your favorite game. Any remark, meaningless or not. Or, you know -- indicate you want the 5 questions. In fact any comment you leave to this will get questions. Even if that comment is "No."
2.I will respond by asking you five personal questions so I can get to know you better. Or piss you off. Or see how creative you can be. If I'm lucky all 3 in 1 go. (I have a historically bad track record at asking these questions, but let's see if I can think of them all this time.)
3. Update your LJ with the answers to the questions.
4. Include this explanation and offer to ask someone else questions in your own post.
5. When others respond with a comment, you will ask them five questions.
6. It spawns. Again.


ETA: I'm not going to try to ask the questions in the order requested. One thing I've learned from the last time around is that, if I try to be too organized about it, I never ask anything. So I'm going to accumulate questions as I think of them, and I'll reply to each message when I get to five. So don't be surprised if it takes a while to get to you: it just means I haven't finished all five questions yet.
[livejournal.com profile] mikekn">
1. What is *your* all time favorite game (modern or period)?

Poker -- really, nothing else even comes close. In particular, Dealer's Choice has everything I look for in a game: a combination of a fundamental core that I understand, chaotically shifting details, and a deep social dynamic. In general, I'm a crappy strategist but a decent tactician, so Poker suits my skills decently well.

We've got a monthly table that's been running for something north of ten years now. It remains one of my highlights of the month.

2. What SCA accomplishment (not award) are you most proud of?

Tricky, given the breadth of my interests. Two seem to be about tied, so I'll give both of them. On the one hand, there is "getting a lot of people started in the SCA" -- between the online question-answering and college demos, it's turned out to be one of my real passions. On the other, there is "teaching a lot of people how to enjoy period dancing", which has always been my real focus: not just focusing on authenticity and not just having fun, but showing how the two go hand-in-hand.

3. If given the opportunity, would you serve on the SCA BOD? Why or why not?

Well, the evidence says no -- I've been nominated (some years back), and declined the nomination. There are a variety of reasons why, but it's mostly style and inclination: I always prefer to be in jobs where the lines of responsibility are very clear, and the Board is really very messy in that regard. And I'm one of the more infamous anti-bureaucrats in the Society: my sense of honor would probably lead me to try to clean up and slim the Society's bureaucracy, which in all likelihood wouldn't make *anybody* particularly happy. So in a sense, I'm the Loyal Opposition to the Board; joining it would be a tad unnatural.

That said, I don't rule anything out. Certainly I wouldn't do so *now* -- I have too many personal irons in the fire to be able to give the job the appropriate amount of attention. Someday -- well, who knows. It's possible, but I'd have to convince myself that the job wouldn't make me crazy.

4. Do you feel there is still a place for Masonic orders in the 21st century? Or have they grown outdated?

Very interesting, and fraught question, with a bunch of aspects to it.

On the one hand, I suspect that Masonry As We Know It is basically toast. It is structurally designed to be a very large organization, with a lot of fat that grew up in its heyday, and none of that is easy to shed. This causes structural difficulties that are causing something of a death spiral: there are *far* too many individual Lodges, and they are far too reluctant to merge until it's too late, with the result that most are perpetually teetering. So my guess is that the vast majority of today's Lodges aren't going to survive, and the Grand Lodge system will at best need major rejiggering.

And it can't be denied that some aspects of the organization look old at this point. In particular, the male-only thing just looks kind of odd in the modern world, and I don't think it actually adds anything useful. When you're talking about a club that's nearly 300 years old in its current form, it's not surprising that bits of it look archaic -- society as a whole has moved on.

That said, I think the underlying needs are still there. Masonry as a spiritual outlet is really quite neat -- the use of symbolic ritual to teach moral lessons works well if you take it seriously, hitting a lot of basic buttons in the human psyche. So I think that *something* is likely to survive. It may well mutate considerably; it might not even be Masonry per se in a century. (My "Mysteries" project could yet happen one of these years: that takes many of the core ideas of Masonry, and recasts them in a new form.) But I suspect something will continue on.

5. What SCA History question would you like to see answered?

How has the Society changed demographically over the years, and how does that correlate with the changes in the Corporation? I have a lot of theories in that regard, but it's fairly difficult to tease the answers out...
jducoeur: (Default)
As always, the memes that catch my attention are the ones that require you to say something about yourself. This one is from an unusual and interesting angle.  I got it from [livejournal.com profile] cellio, after seeing it in a couple of other places.

Edited to change the "art" answer.

Read more... )
jducoeur: (Default)
As always, the memes that catch my attention are the ones that require you to say something about yourself. This one is from an unusual and interesting angle.  I got it from [livejournal.com profile] cellio, after seeing it in a couple of other places.

Edited to change the "art" answer.

Read more... )
jducoeur: (Default)
I don't do most memes, because they don't say anything interesting. But the self-reflective ones can be fun. And now that a few other people have jogged my memory about What Happened When, this is a little more feasible:
What Happened When )
jducoeur: (Default)
I don't do most memes, because they don't say anything interesting. But the self-reflective ones can be fun. And now that a few other people have jogged my memory about What Happened When, this is a little more feasible:
What Happened When )
jducoeur: (Default)
Since this one is actually interesting enough to be worth doing...
30-some questions )
jducoeur: (Default)
Since this one is actually interesting enough to be worth doing...
30-some questions )
jducoeur: (Default)
Whilst I attempt to calm down enough to keep the upcoming political rant well-focused, let's do something calmer. Here's a little intellectual exercise I sometimes indulge in, when I'm thinking about how things change, and how they don't.

Say that you have a time machine. But in order to prevent paradoxes, the only way you can interact with the past is by mentally communicating with people in their final moments, who can't pass on anything you tell them.

Pick a historical figure to talk to. What do you ask them, and what do you tell them? How do you expect them to react? Do you pick a great person and tell them what they accomplished? A villain to torment with their ultimate failure? Or just a normal person in the hurly-burly of normal life?

This line of thought brought to you by musings of how Henry VIII would have reacted, had he known that his child would solidify so much of what he set out to do -- but that it would be Anne Boleyn's daughter, not Jane Seymour's son, who did it. (I just finished a fascinating course on Henry's life and times. Now I really need to listen to the one that puts it in the context of what happened next...)
jducoeur: (Default)
Whilst I attempt to calm down enough to keep the upcoming political rant well-focused, let's do something calmer. Here's a little intellectual exercise I sometimes indulge in, when I'm thinking about how things change, and how they don't.

Say that you have a time machine. But in order to prevent paradoxes, the only way you can interact with the past is by mentally communicating with people in their final moments, who can't pass on anything you tell them.

Pick a historical figure to talk to. What do you ask them, and what do you tell them? How do you expect them to react? Do you pick a great person and tell them what they accomplished? A villain to torment with their ultimate failure? Or just a normal person in the hurly-burly of normal life?

This line of thought brought to you by musings of how Henry VIII would have reacted, had he known that his child would solidify so much of what he set out to do -- but that it would be Anne Boleyn's daughter, not Jane Seymour's son, who did it. (I just finished a fascinating course on Henry's life and times. Now I really need to listen to the one that puts it in the context of what happened next...)

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags