jducoeur: (Default)

While it was by no means the high point of the vacation, it's worth talking a little about the sheer craziness that is The Fremont Street Experience. The Golden Nugget is on Fremont Street, and yes, the "Experience" is part of the official name.

I had originally assumed that that was pretentious, but yeah -- it's an experience all right. For several blocks, it's a pedestrian plaza, and it is just about the loudest place I've ever been. It's almost civilized in the morning, but by midafternoon there are stages blasting cover bands and DJs every few blocks: mid-evening, we could barely hear each other yell, when standing side-by-side.

The street is covered with an arched roof, running the full several blocks, so it's hard to quite call it "outside". (I didn't mask, but I did seriously think about it.) The inside of the roof is completely lined with LEDs, showing graphics that may have sometimes been sync'ed to the music.

Approximately every hundred feet is a bar, serving on the street. Most of them have a wall of frozen drink machines -- which are served in yard glasses, of course.

It would all be horribly hot, but between the fact that it is roofed, and there are doors opening onto air-conditioned casinos everywhere, so it's actually weirdly pleasant until you step off of Fremont into the sun.

(All of this was made even crazier by the enormous festival of music, food, and general bacchanalia down in Container Park, at the end of the street, taking up something like sixteen square blocks that were closed off for the duration. Around 6pm, it turned into a river of pedestrians heading in that direction.)

Basically, the overall effect is Bourbon Street during Mardi Gras, except without the soul and the good music. It is, indeed, an experience -- but not really our style...

jducoeur: (Default)

No surprise (us being us), there are going to be a couple of posts about food. Let's talk about the surprise highlight -- Spring Mountain Road.

This is sometimes called Vegas' "Chinatown", but it's inaccurate in a couple of ways. First, it's not really a "town": rather, it's a linear strip several miles long and a couple of blocks wide. Second, it's by no means just Chinese -- it's a profusion of Asian cultures sitting side-by-side. And it's not just Asian: there's a bunch of other stuff around. But the notable aspect is the Asian markets, shops, and wow, so many restaurants.


The first day Downtown, while we had a car, we decided to wander down to Spring Mountain, explore a bit, and pick something up for dinner. In the interest of safety, we were trying to only eat inside restaurants that we really cared about, and while there were some patios along Fremont Street, there wasn't anything calling out to us for dinner. So it was time to explore takeout.

A recommendation in a guidebook led us to Sushi Neko, and that proved to be a remarkable win. No, the website isn't much to look at, but the sushi menu really is that big -- more importantly, it's surprisingly great.

That section titled "Spicy Roll"? They are not kidding. We like spicy, so we got both the "Little Tease Roll" and the "Call 911 Roll", both of which were ferocious, but also complex and tasty, and that applied to all the rolls we got: they ranged from better than average to excellent. And they know how to do takeout: all sauced rolls come with the toppings on the side. (We wound up with a lot of little tubs of different toppings.)

Suffice it to say, it was good enough that we went back again the next evening for a different set of rolls, and didn't regret it. Frankly, if we ever do wind up back in Vegas in less-Covid-concerned times, we'd love to eat in the restaurant and try more of the menu, which is full of things that didn't look like they would travel as well.


That said, while the sushi was great, it was the accidental snack that really blew me away.

We spent an hour in the late afternoon wandering around Spring Mountain Road, and quickly found ourselves tired and hot. So we were looking for a cold drink when we stumbled across Sweet Mong. The online menu isn't terribly unusual, but that's because it is aimed at takeout / delivery. What doesn't show up there is the Seoul Bingsoo. I had no idea what it was, but the guy behind the counter said, "Do you like shaved ice?", and that sounded appealing in the heat.

(Subsequent research indicates that it is a favorite dessert in South Korea, but this was the first time I've encountered it.)

When it came to our table (yes, out on the patio), the result was much more interesting than I had expected. As best I could figure out, this was (from bottom to top):

  • A mound of shaved, gently milky ice
  • A layer of glaze that quick-froze, melting and refreezing a little of the ice below it
  • Another layer of shaved ice
  • Another layer of glaze
  • A sprinkle of -- nuts? puffed rice? I'm not sure of all the bits, but it added lovely slight crunch
  • Pieces of chewy mochi
  • A mound of sweet red bean

Altogether it was fabulous -- easily four times as much as I'd been looking for in a snack, and I ate just about all of it anyway. Moderately sweet, cold, complex: it was just about the perfect dessert for a hot day.

Really, out of all the good food we had in Las Vegas (we'll get to the really fancy dinners in a later entry), that one dish was the one that left me going, "Wah -- wrong end of the country!". As far as I can tell, Sweet Mong is just that one little shop on Spring Mountain now, but it has shot to the tip-top of my list of places I want to see open in Davis Square. We've gotten past Maximum Thai and Peak Poke: fabulous shaved ice would be a fine addition to the neighborhood...

jducoeur: (Default)

Got back from vacation last night. We weren't quite comfortable planning for a return to Europe yet, so we decided to do something we've been talking about idly for years: a trip to Las Vegas and the Grand Canyon. We'd each only been there fairly briefly, and were curious.

So that's where we spent the last week or so, in a few parts:

  • Two days staying at the Golden Nugget in Downtown Las Vegas (aka "Glitter Gulch", the heart of the classic stereotype of LV)
  • One day staying at El Tovar in Grand Canyon Village on the South Rim
  • Three days at the MGM Grand, the third biggest hotel in the world, one of the ones that define The Strip (the stereotype of "modern" LV)

plus one travel day between each of those -- ten days total, including two in the air and two driving two and from the Canyon.

As usual, I'm going to do a series of posts about various high points, rather than a chronological travelogue. So let's get into it...

Planned entries (I'll come back and edit this as I add stuff):

jducoeur: (Default)

As our Hawaii trip draws to a close, I'm thinking about the significant highlights. And one of them is just about the ultimate example of "It's about the journey, not the destination": Hana.

For those who have never studied a map of Hawaii (as I hadn't before we planned this trip), Maui is kind of two islands joined at the hip. To the left (west) is the smaller lobe -- due to the way trade winds work, that is the hotter, drier side of the island. (For the same reasons why Kona is the hot, dry side of the big island.) That is exemplified by Lahaina, the tourist center where we have spent most of the week. To the right (east) is the bigger lobe, which is wetter and lusher. That has one small town of note: Hana, at the eastern end of the island.

Hana is quite small. The "downtown" stretch includes something like seven places to eat, of which five are food trucks and one is the fancy resort. There are several other places to stay (including the Hana Inn, a six-room place where we spent the night), but it's not the kind of place you go to for the town.

The reason you go to Hana is for the drive itself. The Road to Hana (Route 360) is a tiny, torturous, gorgeous road along the north edge of eastern Maui. It's only about 30 miles long, which makes it sound like a quick little there-and-back, and that's how most tourists do it: they land in Maui, immediately head east, turn around and drive back.

What that misses is that this is a slow road, and best treated as such. If you know state Route 1 down the California coast, the Road to Hana is a lot like that, but ten thousand times as lush and considerably less terrifying.

Like Route 1, you're basically driving along cliffside for much of it, so this is not a drive I recommend to timid drivers. But the speed limits are far more sensible: the road is mostly marked with a no-kidding-we-mean-it 25 MPH limit, frequently marked 15 or even 10 MPH when going around curves. And you are never not going around curves: during the main part of the drive, I don't think the steering wheel is ever straight for more than maybe 50 yards. 90 degree curves are common, and 180-degree switchbacks aren't unusual.

Just to make this more fun, it is full of single-lane bridges, so you need to pause and yield to oncoming traffic on a frequent basis. I have to imagine that being in a rush on this road must be maddening. But driving it at the speed limit is positively Zen, even a bit relaxing. Turns that would be gut-wrenching terror at 30 miles per hour are fairly calm at 10, and just assuming that you are going to at least mostly stop at every bridge forces you to chill out.

(Yes, there are people who want to do it much faster. Fortunately, the people who built the road were smart, and there are pull-offs several times per mile. So when a tailgater starts climbing up your ass, you just get out of the way and let them pass.)

What makes all this worthwhile is the scenery. More than anywhere I've ever seen, you can count on every mile having at least one view that takes your breath away. Sometimes it is waterfalls, sometimes jungle canopies, sometimes crashing waves, sometimes a broad view of the mile-wide canyon that you are crawling along. Even for the driver (who needs to keep their eyes on the road) it's pretty great; the passengers get to really enjoy. It's basically a two to three hour journey through some of the greatest beauty possible, surrounded by an endless variety of greenery.

There are also many places to pull over and see the sights. Our guidebook provided a fine mile-by-mile breakdown of the options, and we did several, ranging from the slightly crowded little park with a lovely waterfall to the mile-long drive down a side road, followed by a hike down to the shoreline, leading to the best coastal view we found in all of Hawaii. It's worth planning some of these little side-treks.

Note that it will rain on you at some point: you're in a rainforest here, so just build that into your assumptions. Again, so long as you are going slow, that's not a big deal.

So if you find yourself in Maui, that drive is my strongest recommendation. The destinations are decently nice, but that road is the reason to come here. Plan to stay overnight in Hana so that you can take your time, and don't get started eastward until the traffic dies down (around noonish). But do go a-wandering...

jducoeur: (Default)

No, this isn't about terrorism or anything of the sort. It's about scary activities, and ways to make them more or less scary.

Context: so, we're currently on vacation, and have been for a couple of weeks so far. It is a long, long, long-planned trip for my in-laws' 50th. The original theory was that they were going to go to Australia, and then we would meet them in Hawaii. That was supposed to happen last year; for obvious reasons, not so much. And Australia is still out of the question -- while there are hints of the borders opening, they're still not welcoming tourists. But we've been in Hawaii for the better part of two weeks now, and as of this morning we're on our own, having left the family group. So I have time to start writing, and a bunch of random posts will probably follow in the coming days.

(Yes, Hawaii. Yes, Hawaii is being super-strict about its covid protocols. That's why I haven't availed myself of any of the wonderful-looking SCA events that have started happening in the past couple of months, and why even our socializing fell to almost nil for several weeks: we wanted to make extra-sure that we were clean before traveling.)

But I digress...

We spent the past four days in the town of Hilo, on the eastern side of the Big Island of Hawaii. On two successive days, we did two adventurous excursions, and they're a fascinating compare and contrast. First, there was a tour through a couple of lava tubes that was far scarier than it really should have been; then there was a zipline tour that should have scared the living bejeezus out of acrophobic me, and yet wasn't that bad. And it all came down to professionalism.

The lava tube tour is basically spelunking -- the only difference is that you are going into a tube that was "dug" by fast-moving lava in a long-ago volcanic eruption. This is a common thing around here: the islands are volcanic, and the ground is basically Swiss cheese as a result. And the first half of the tour was fine -- the floor of the tube was fairly flat, the tunnel was wide, and aside from a few places where we needed to crouch it was plenty tall enough. We all had helmets, gloves and flashlights, so it was all fairly tame and pleasant.

But the second hour was the "adventure" tour, through a less-public tube. It started by all of us clambering down a 20-foot construction ladder into the entrance. (With all of our feet muddy from getting there, and no safety precautions whatsoever.) Then we get led by our guide down into a cavern piled pretty randomly with large, sharp, randomly-shaped and frequently unstable rocks. At once point we wound up walking very carefully along an 8-inch-wide ledge halfway up the cavern wall, ten feet above the rocks below. Up and down we went, trying to follow a guide who was traipsing well ahead of us, not paying much attention to how folks were doing and whether we were finding safe paths across the rocks. And mind, we had two 70-year-olds in the party.

We got out of it mostly intact: my mother in law got a nasty bruise on her leg, but nobody got seriously hurt. I have to attribute that in fair part to luck, though -- there were many occasions when somebody could easily have slipped and broken a leg or worse. I have no evidence that they had any plans or preparation for what to do if that happened.

And the hell of it is, it was almost exactly what I expected. Before we got there, the back of my brain was going, "If somebody says, 'Oh, you don't need masks here', that's a bad sign" -- and that was almost the first words out of the proprietor's mouth when we arrived: the only time I've heard that in all of Hawaii. The place was not just out of the way, they had lost power sometime in the past, so there were no lights, nor even working plumbing. It reeked of a complete lack of professionalism from start to finish, and the result was an experience that was a lot scarier, and less fun, than it should have been.

Then there was the zipline tour. Starting in some agricultural upland, this was a series of seven progressively-more-interesting lines. The first was the pure training-wheels line -- probably 50 yards, about eight feet off the ground, just to show you how the equipment works, how to get set up, how to launch yourself, how to land, and so on. From there, each line roughly doubled in length and interest, culminating in a line that was, no shit, half a mile long, something like a quarter mile over a ravine with a fast-rushing river and waterfalls.

Like I said, I'm acrophobic -- in principle, this was one of the scariest things I've ever done. But the tour operators were the exact opposite of the day before. Despite our two guides both being youngish and very casual and laid-back (indeed, she was giving him a constant stream of snark that reminded me of nothing so much as me and Aaron), they were both extremely precise and detail-oriented. When each participant got up on the "launchpad", the humor took a back seat to what looked to be a well-trained ten-point checklist, communicated by walkie-talkie between the sending and receiving ends before sending us on our way. When they were on the lines themselves they were just having fun (he was particularly fond of pulling various positions as he flew through the air), but on the ground it was all business. And the harnesses themselves were clearly well-designed, with no apparent single points of failure.

The result was that it was really less scary, and far more fun, than the lava tube, because the rational side of my brain could appreciate the sheer number of redundancies and checks that they had in place against someone getting hurt. We even chatted with them about "What if someone gets stuck in the middle?" -- which they casually admitted does happen (especially if you have a guest who is a little too light and a headwind). And they crawl out onto the line and fetch them. (She said that she actually finds that part rather fun, but it slows the tour down too much.) No denial that things could go wrong; instead, careful advance planning and training about how to react when it does.

The moral of the story isn't surprising: a well-designed and well-run activity is just plain more fun than a slipshod one. I'm sure that the lava tube operator would proudly brag that this was an "adventure" tour and you should expect danger from the name, but I really can't recommend it to anyone -- it was pointlessly risky, to no real benefit, and not well-described as such. Whereas the zipline was simply a blast: scary, but more exhilarating than terrifying...

jducoeur: (Default)

Time to fend off the stir-crazy, so we took a long weekend back in Great Barrington, staying at the same weird but wonderful house where we were back in September. (The one on such a steep hill that the roof of the fourth floor almost comes to street level, and they built a bridge from it over to the road.)

The weather hasn't been terribly cooperative, so Friday was simply a shopping out-and-about, checking out fun little stores in Lenox, Stockbridge and Great Barrington.

But the point of going to the Berkshires is hiking.

Yesterday we went out to Bartholomew's Cobble, a lovely wander through some easy nature trail down by a river, and a bit of uplands hiking scrambling around.

Today's main focus was Bob's Way, a nice forest walk with a lot of rolling hills -- several miles of ups and downs.

Following that, we still had a little energy, so we went back the Benedict Pond Loop Trail, which we had enjoyed last year but taken the relatively sedate road for a good chunk of it. This time, we did the real trail the whole way around the pond, which turns out to be much more fun but a lot more effort, especially in muddy conditions: much of a mile of hopping strategically from rock to rock to avoid the mud.

Good exercise all around, and helps me feel like I'm getting value from my AllTrails subscription. I suspect we'll find somewhere other than Great Barrington for our next discretionary vacation, once we can leave the state and not feel guilty about quarantines, but it does continue to be a lovely place to visit...

jducoeur: (Default)

A bit of vacation diary, a bit of review this time around. Kate and I got back from Disneyworld a week ago. This year's trip was during the Epcot International Food and Wine Festival, so let's talk a bit about that.

The Festival runs all around Epcot, in lots of little standalone booths. On the World Showcase side, there's one at most of the countries, plus a bunch more countries in-between; there are also several more in Future World.

Each booth serves (typically) three small plates of food, and a few different drinks. It's effectively fast food, but efficient as few places aside from Disney can manage: from ordering to walking away with your food takes something like a minute on average.

One downside: we were there during September. Right after Hurricane Dorian, which left Disneyworld feeling like it was in the middle of, well, a swamp. And there is precious little shade in Epcot. So if you are there in similar weather, be prepared to get your food and go scavenging for a shaded table. Or in the lee of a building. Or under a tree. Or anything to get out of the blistering sun. (Our primary challenge, throughout this vacation, was avoiding heatstroke.)

Everything is at least decent, but much of it is unremarkable. So let's focus on the highlights.

Starting with the punchline: the best dish out of the whole festival is, no shit, the Mac and Cheese. At Active Eats, they carry a Loaded Macaroni and Cheese made with Cheddar, leeks, bacon and, if my palate is accurate, a touch of cayenne. It's just Mac and Cheese -- but in my book, it's pretty much the Platonic ideal of the form. We went back for thirds.

Second pick for me was the Maple Bourbon Cheesecake at The Cheese Studio. Rich, sweet, complex and perfect for a stupidly hot September day.

Earth Eats is basically an ad for Impossible Foods (makers of really serious fake beef), but a pretty good one. The Impossible Slider is good but not quite great. The Impossible Cottage Pie, though, is pretty impressive: the fakemeat, mashed cauliflower and veggies that actually look like veggies make for a fine demonstration that you can get a nicely satisfying meat-based dish with any actual meat. I'm by no means a vegan, but understand the ecological situation well enough that I'm glad to see steady progress here.

Last but not least is the very first thing we tried when we get to Disney: Morocco's Spicy Hummus Fries. Mind, these aren't fries covered with hummus. These are hummus, deep-fried in a vaguely french-fry shape, covered with tzatziki, cucumbers, tomatoes, chipotle sauce -- I've never had anything quite like them. They're kind of like middle-eastern poutine, but so much better. Different and deeply yummy.

Upshot: if you are at Epcot during the Food and Wine Festival, and only have room for two dishes, make it the Mac and Cheese and the Spicy Hummus Fries. And since they booths are close to a mile apart, you can get some exercise in-between to work off all those calories...

jducoeur: (Default)

Okay, I jinxed it. No, there weren't any disasters, just a bunch of sudden and unwelcome stress.

Icelandair gets a big black mark for their computer system. Specifically, we got to the airport roughly the recommended three hours ahead of time. And as we were walking to the checkin line, I got a text message saying that our seats had been changed from 11A and B (window and aisle, reasonably nice seats that we had booked months ago) to 35C and 36C (middle of the place, not together, seriously sub-optimal for a six hour flight home).

Suffice it to say that I kind of lost my shit, all the moreso when the lady tending the line responded that they were absolutely within their legal rights to do this. Which is true, but not exactly a good customer service message.

Fortunately, the lady at baggage check, who checked us in, took the problem seriously, apologized, and spent about five minutes figuring out how to get us 34A and B -- not quite as good as what we had booked, but at least decent. I'm still annoyed at the airline (and given how expensive Reykjavik is, not especially inclined to take it again), but she at least deserves kudos.


Reykjavik airport does have a lovely, huge duty-free, full of all sorts of fun toys. I got a bunch of nips of random Icelandic booze to sample. No, I didn't drink them all on the spot, but it was tempting.


Stress, part 2: just when my blood pressure had calmed down, we got to the automated gates where you scan your boarding pass to get into the actual gate area. My luck being what it was on Saturday, instead of the nice friendly green checkmark I got a bright flashing red X. Yes, I had been chosen for a random TSA search. Yay.

(A TSA search in Europe? I dunno, but that's what they said it was.)

To be fair, they were very professional, and impressively efficient. But having to have all of my bags opened and searched, and my body swabbed all over, while I was already stressed about running a little bit late getting to the gate, did nothing to help my mood.


From there, the flight itself was pretty uneventful. Remarkably cramped seats, and an older couple behind us who could only talk to each other by shouting loudly, but as flights go, not horrible.


Let's end on a happier note: lunch. I had forgotten to mention, in my previous entry, that we had had lunch on Friday at the Sandholt, a couple of blocks from our hotel. This was mostly a testimony to the power of a good advertising board on the sidewalk: they listed a sourdough Croque Madame, which kind of jumped out and grabbed me, yelling "Lunch! Luuuuunch!"

It's a lovely if slightly chaotic bakery and brunch place. On Friday I had that sandwich -- wide slabs of deeply toasted sourdough with ham and buttery cheese, a fried egg on top and a side salad, all of which is right up my alley: it was pretty great. And Kate had the Duck Rillete "hamburger", which was nothing at all like a hamburger but was seriously tasty. All of which was good enough that we had the same for lunch on Saturday, along with a big glass of their local-brew Currant and Lime Soda (delish), and a pair of big sweet cinnamon rolls for dessert on the plane.

So that gets a solid recommendation, if you find yourself in town. They serve breakfast until 11:30, lunch thereafter, and everything we had was seriously tasty.

jducoeur: (Default)

Thursday was a travel day, focused on airplanes. We did go back to our traditional pattern of Asian for lunch, getting a surprisingly decent pair of curries at the Berlin Airport.

Icelandair turns out to be in Terminal C. Sadly, most of the good services are in Terminal A. If you wind up taking Icelandair out of Berlin, note that the food court with the decent options requires following a long maze of twisty little passages, but sufficient tenacity will be rewarded.

European exit rows work a lot better when you know in advance that you can't put anything under the seat in front of you, and realize that you need to grab everything you'll want before you sit down.


Reykjavik -- well, Kate and I have been debating it. I think it's kind of like Manhattan; hotel rooms are too small, and everything costs vastly too much. That's the bait-and-switch of flying Icelandair: the airfare is quite reasonable, but if you do a layover you will pay through the nose. (She argues that, in Manhattan, is is possible to find cheap food. Not so much here: even the Chinese restaurant is $30 for a dinner entree.)

Our hotel is the Alda, and on the one hand it's quite nice: new, well-appointed, clean and all that. OTOH, our room is a poster child for the word "cozy". The photo on their website is not a typical double room -- in fact, this is one of the most compact rooms I've ever stayed in. There's one small chair, and nothing even pretending to be a desk.

Really, the size is best exemplified by this photo of the shower. If that looks like two doors closed in the corner, you have it basically correct. You build the shower stall by opening both doors out to a 90-degree angle -- at which point it is now impossible to use the toilet. It works quite decently, but boy, they are maximizing their space usage to a degree I have rarely seen elsewhere.


Dinner Thursday night was at Kol, mainly on the grounds that the description from the concierge sounded good. And it is good -- but man, it's insanely expensive.

It's high-end, and slightly pretentious. We wound up just getting appetizers and drinks: my seafood bisque was fabulous -- rich and complex, if a tad salty -- but a smallish bowl ran something like $25. It was tasty enough for our anniversary dinner (yesterday was the 5th anniversary of our wedding, although not our marriage), but between jetlag and insane prices, I'm afraid that it wasn't quite what we might have wished.


Today (Friday) featured fairly sucktastic weather -- cool (low 40s, which I would expect from Iceland) and staggeringly windy (ditto) but also constantly drizzling (not surprising, but not expected per se). So we didn't wander as much of Reykjavik as I'd hoped, although we did get to at least see much of the core tourist district.

Note to self: my fedora blows off my head very easily, which probably explains why basically nobody on the streets of Reykjavik wears hats like that. But if I pull my windbreaker's hood over it, and tie it down, it looks entirely ridiculous, but actually works quite nicely.

Once we were sufficiently cold and wet, we made a beeline for the National Museum of Iceland, which proved to be the main focus of the day: we spent almost three hours there, and could have spent more.

On the one hand, this museum is run much more "on rails" than most. The core of the museum is two floors, and it is all arranged roughly chronologically. You start at the front of the first floor, which talks about the initial discovery and colonization of Iceland in the 9th century. The next section talks about the Christianization of the island, then the various political evolutions. You get to the far end of the first floor around 1400 AD, go up the stairs, and come back via the second floor, ending with independence (via a truly magnificent bit of legal rules-hacking, in which Iceland argued that they had made a personal contract with the King of Denmark, and since it was no longer a monarchy they were no longer bound to it) at the beginning of the 20th century, and then a mad rush at the end of "here's all of the 20th century stuff that you already know" in a fairly concise display.

But for all that, it doesn't feel like walking through an IKEA store: it's chronological from one end to the other, but each floor is several exhibits wide, and laid out very organically, so you can choose the order in which you explore everything. And there are touchscreens every now and then, with in-depth history lessons that provide the grounding in political and social history of the things you are looking at; Kate and I stopped at pretty much all of these, and enjoyed listening to the lessons.

It's a really fun museum: a very well-thought-though lesson in Icelandic history and culture from the very beginning up to the modern day. If you ever find yourself in town, I strongly recommend a visit.


Finally, dinner tonight was at the Old Iceland Restaurant. No, they're not trying to recreate authentic historical dishes -- the food is really quite modern and chic. But far more than Kol, they are focused on specifically Icelandic food.

This was the meal that I'm going to treat as our anniversary dinner: it was very expensive, but not as eye-wateringly so as Kol, and felt more like a perfectly-assembled meal. It being Iceland, I had the lamb, and Kate the cod; each was fabulously constructed. The lamb was heavily seasoned, with a perfect crust on top of lamb that was rarer than I would ever make at home, but good enough to warrant that, served with a fabulous beetroot sauce (and mind, I don't like beets) and roasted potatoes. Kate and I both share the religion of "save the best for last" when it comes to good food, and I found it downright difficult to figure out which bit was best.

We followed that up with a lovely thin brownie, swimming in butterscotch, with a bit of muesli and fruit and a scoop of vanilla ice cream -- absolutely heavenly.

Old Iceland doesn't take reservations, and has absolutely zero space for waiting, so you should prepare to put your name in and make yourself scarce for 30-60 minutes. But it is absolutely out-of-the-world -- my single highest dinner recommendation from this trip.


And tomorrow, we come home. Fingers crossed, that hopefully won't be interesting enough to write about...

jducoeur: (Default)

Last full day of Berlin, so we decided to do some more local history, visiting the Schloss Charlottenburg -- the baroque palace built for Sophie Charlotte of Prussia in the late 17th and early 18th centuries.

Emphasis on "baroque", mind -- the place is very overdone to my taste. But the audio tour is well-constructed, informative and reasonably entertaining, walking you through the history of the building as you go from room to room, tracing the generations as they added more and more wings.

(One disappointment: they have the prince's Kriegspiel set, but the box is closed rather than set up.)

It's an interesting tour, and drives home the darker sides of the history more than most of what we saw in Berlin -- large fractions of the palace were bombed heavily during the second world war, and have been reconstructed to a greater or lesser degree. But the majority of the tour is of rooms that remained mostly intact.


On our way home, we accidentally stumbled into the middle of an Oktoberfest fair in Aleksanderplatz. This was every bit as kitschy as I would have expected, and we only spent about fifteen minutes in it, but I will admit, the temptation to eat and drink way too much there was substantial.


(Oh, and for lunch we violated our pattern of Asian lunches, picking up fast-food fish and chips in the train station on the way to the palace. We paid for this sin: it was certainly the worst meal we had in Berlin.)

For dinner, OTOH, we kept with the pattern, going for French at Sucre et Sel. Kate had found this the first night (while I was in horrible pain), and declared that she was dragging me back for our last dinner in Germany.

Sucre et Sel is a tiny, cramped island of France in the middle of East Berlin, maybe half a block from Hotel Circus. The usual gauge of a quality ethnic restaurant held up: we were largely surrounded by French-speakers, here for a taste of home. Kate observed that the place wouldn't even be legal in the US -- the tables were crammed too closely together for accessibility -- and they were running on what appeared to be a skeleton staff (two waiters, two chefs and a bartender), all of whom were moving flat-out to deal with the capacity crowd.

Dinner was great. We started with a cheese and charcuterie plate of delightful complexity, including one of the most perfect blue cheeses I've had and a goat cheese and jam combination that was my highlight of the evening. Kate went traditional for her main -- a beautiful duck leg confit -- but I went for another flammkuchen. The flavors this time were French (salami and blue cheese, with a salad on top), but it was the same cracker crust we had at the German restaurant the other day. I'm kind of in love with this preparation.

Sucre et Sel is definitely worth looking up if you're in East Berlin, but make reservations: it was still jammed when we finished at 10pm.

jducoeur: (Default)

So, Berlin Warning #1 -- you want to go to the Pergamon Museum? It's a neat museum full of antiquities, so the answer may be yes, but are you sure? If so, note (as we discovered the hard way) that the line to get in on Sunday gets to be two hours long. That's why we went to the Bode Museum instead, then went online and bought timed tickets for Tuesday to the Pergamon.

Which leads to Berlin Warning #2 -- you want to go to the Pergamon Museum? That's great, and well-recommended -- but do note that about 80% of it is closed for renovations at the moment. Like, there are currently three wings, of which two have gigantic, loud construction equipment all over them. And the third has half a floor closed. (And the fourth wing is still being designed, much less built.) So there's not quite as much There there as you might wish.

That said -- what's there is really cool. Where the Bode has tons and tons of cool little things the Pergamon is all about gigantic, remarkable displays. Like the main drag of Babylon, carried to Berlin, rebuilt and filled in with tiles to replace the missing ones. (It forms a hallway "only" eight meters wide and 40 long, as opposed to the 30 meters wide originally.) The facade of an entire marble temple rebuilt inside a huge room. Entire rooms that only contain a few items, because those items weigh eight tons each. A fair fraction of the monumental relics of the ancient world are in this building.

There's a measure of cultural appropriation here that sits a little uneasily: this is other cultures' artifacts that have been dragged over to Berlin to be rebuilt. OTOH, there are extensive displays on Yemen and Syria, and the destruction being wreaked on their treasures at home, that kind of drive home the the tradeoffs involved here.

It's fascinating and spectacular, and well visiting. But it will be much more worth visiting once somewhat more of it is open.


(I didn't mention lunch. That's because we went back to Transit, maintaining our Asian lunch habit. Still great.)

Dinner continued to be European -- in this case, truly high-end European. As in, two Michelin stars. We weren't sure where to go for our anniversary, but having heard that restaurant reinstoff was going to be closing its doors at the end of the year, we decided to go for it.

The meal was spectacular, as one might expect. Typically for a high-end progressive meal, we ordered the seven-course menu, and it was actually something like 16 distinct dishes. Each was tiny (the venison was the main dish, perhaps 2-3 ounces of meat; some of them were barely a forkful), but packed with flavor and complexity. The Goose Liver was served both as pate and ice cream. The main bit of Pigeon was delicious, but the small block of Pigeon Praline was out of sight. The Potato Harvest involved potatoes at least half a dozen ways, with a powerfully flavored nut butter underneath, providing a punch of flavor.

It got a little gimmicky at times (the Green Gin and Vermouth involved a densely cucumber-flavored ice cube with a splash of water on top), but was pretty consistently delicious.

The only downside was the bill, which we had expected to be high but actually proved outrageous. This was partly my fault (I went for the fancier pairings, before realizing that the 22 Euros was per glass), but they kind of went above and beyond in nickel-and-diming the bill. Suffice it to say, it was the most expensive meal we've ever had by a wide margin -- a respectable fraction of the total cost of our trip -- and while it was excellent, it wasn't quite that excellent. So chalk that one up as a lesson learned to pay more attention to the price of a place at that level.

jducoeur: (Default)

We have developed an official pattern for our food in Berlin: Asian for lunch, European for dinner. Today, the Asian was at Yumcha Heroes, which can be summarized as DumplingsDumplingsDumplings! We had the Black Beef, Pink Lamb and Shanghai Dumplings, and I was slightly startled to discover that the colors are meant literally: the Lamb are in pinkish wrappers, and the Beef in pitch-black ones. It's pretty clever, actually: all of their dumplings differ in shape and color, which presumably makes life easier for both the waitstaff and patrons. We also had the "Stripes of Beef", which I think is supposed to be "strips", but whatever.

Overall, tasty but not going for lots of seasoning. The Stripes of Beef were a bit overwhelmed by the soy-based sauce, and all three dumplings were flavored mainly by their different meats, with just hints of flavor from the other ingredients. I might be interested in exploring more of the menu someday, but it only gets a 3/5 from me so far -- the concept is great, but I'd love to see more depth of flavor in general.


The afternoon was focused on a walking tour, conducted by Original Berlin Walks. Their website only lists the official tours (which cost money and want reservations), but there are actually also secret, somewhat shorter, tips-only tours that launch from the hostels -- and the Circus Hostel is across the street from the Circus Hotel where we are staying. So we jumped in on that.

Our host, Campbell, was an Australian ex-pat who came to Berlin to study history, and as he described himself as having achieved the ultimate dream of every history major: playing tour guide. Snark aside, though, he was a great guide -- funny, informative and personable -- and I suspect he'll wind up a very good teacher someday.

I can't claim it was a perfect day for a walking tour: it was anywhere from spitting to seriously raining on us for at least half the walk, which in 60ish weather with high wind isn't optimal. But I think everybody (about 15 of us) stuck it out as Campbell walked us around highlights ranging from the Reichstag, to several major points where the Wall used to be, to a block of high-rise East German apartments (with a talk about "this parking lot where we're standing right now? 20 feet down was Hitler's bunker. Let's talk about the last days of Hitler, and what happened after") to finishing at Checkpoint Charlie (with a host of warnings about how very, very fake and Disneyfied it all is, and the various scams to watch for).

I was bemused to realize, as he was talking about the fall of the Wall, that I was the only person present who was an adult at the time. But given that it was a hostel-centric tour group, I shouldn't have been surprised.

Underscoring his future as a teacher, Campbell led us through the Holocaust Memorial, and then tried to get everybody to open up about their impressions. The word that came to my mind was "Kafka-esque" -- the descent into claustrophobia as you walk through it, the failure of the angles to be quite right, the sense of always being in public and on display even while being closed-in, all reminded me of nothing quite so much as Peter Kuper's illustrated editions of Kafka. Of course, some members of the tour objected to how abstract it all is, provoking some mild argument, which Campbell pointed out was kind of the point: this is a memorial intended to keep people thinking about it.

It was a hoot despite the cold and wet, and we were happy to give him a good tip. Based on this, I'd give Original Berlin Walks a solid thumbs-up, especially if you can choose less sucktastic weather.


For dinner (European, remember), Kate declared that we really should do actual German food at least once during our trip. (Which led us to a long digression about whether the phrase "American food" means anything.) We asked for recommendations at the concierge, and after deciding that Lokal looked way too trendy and modern for what we were looking for, we instead opted for Schwarzwaldstuben.

It was a perfect choice -- as I had a feeling it would be from the fact that we were almost the only non-Germans in the place. I gather that "German food" is also a bit hard to define, and this place is more specifically a Black Forest restaurant, but it's a delight: really a German gastropub more than anything.

We split a Flammkuchen -- a crisp cracker-pizza made with sour cream, sweet potato and chorizo. Which sounded intriguing but a bit scary (I'm not a huge sweet potato fan), but the flavors balanced perfectly, the sweetness of the potato against the sour from the cream.

Then we had the "Geschmelzte Maultaschen mit schwäbischem Kartoffelsalat" (thank heaven for online menus and cut-and-paste). This revealed that the second theme of the day was Meat Dumplings: five big triangles of meat-filled dough, fried in oil and onions -- vaguely pierogie-like, but more substantial and crispy -- served with a savory potato salad.

I took the opportunity to pair that with a half-liter of German beer (it being the right meal for that -- I had the Konig Ludwig brown ale, a fine middle-of-the-road ale that paired very well with the food).

And having noticed that the "Bitters and Half-Bitters" list included something I'd never heard of -- Borgmann Kräuterlikör -- I of course had to try that. It's a good mild Amaro, very cinnamon-forward with only a little bitterness, which I'd recommend to folks looking for a less-dangerous Amaro to try. (And they served it in the most wonderful glass: a shotglass-shaped block of glass, frozen hard, with just enough cavity at the top for one shot. I must have one of these.)

jducoeur: (Default)

Today we slept off the jetlag, so by the time we fully crawled out of bed and were showered, it was time to look for lunch.

Lunch was, slightly randomly, at Transit. This was an excellent choice. It's a fun, funky little restaurant focusing on small plates of Asian-fusion food. We shared four little bowls:

  • A couple of things that were vaguely like thin, Thai-flavored eggrolls.
  • Peking duck (Kate's complaint was that there was too much hoisin; I thought they were great).
  • A bowl of spicy wok-cooked beef.
  • Beautifully crispy pork belly with an intense, somewhat salty sauce.

Overall, absolutely delightful, and pretty cheap. I'd happily go back -- we talked about the fact that an outpost of this place in Davis Square would be a huge hit.

The theory was that we were going to the Pergamon Museum today, since it was a rainy Sunday. But the line was about two hours long, so we punted in favor of the Bode Museum next door instead.

This proved a great choice, not least because their current exhibition, Beyond Compare, is just plain brilliant. The Bode specializes in antique through baroque art, and this exhibit added in lots of contemporary art from Africa. But it didn't put that in a wing by itself -- instead, it laced the African art throughout the museum, deliberately comparing and contrasting it with European artwork that illustrated the similarities and differences. I suspect many of our friends would absolutely adore this exhibit -- its anthropological viewpoint (stepping away from the usual Euro-centricity and viewing it from the outside) was very eye-opening.

Another interesting detail: the Bode has an enormous display of coins and medallions throughout history -- thousands of them spread across half a dozen rooms, covering the full scope of the subject. All sorts of neat examples, from the individual gold coins that would have been a year's wages in period, to the Obama medallion anchoring the point that this is an artform that lives on today.

For dinner, we talked to one of the concierges at the hotel -- he recommended several restaurants, of which we chose Marina Blu. This is apparently pretty new, and while it wasn't very crowded, it was downright excellent. Straight-up high-quality Italian -- focused a bit on pizza, but we were in the mood for pasta.

Kate went for a red-sauce ragu that respected its meat in a way you rarely see: instead of the usual "meat sauce", this has big, fall-apart-tender chunks of beef, a fine meatball, and generally the sort of meat focus you actually see in Italy, but rarely in "Italian". And I had a Carbonara that was admittedly not as good as I had in Rome -- but that's comparing against reputedly the best Carbonara in the world, and this was the second-best I've had. "Carbonara" in the US so often means pasta with bacon in a cream sauce, but this was the real thing: flavorful guancile with perfectly-cooked spaghetti, in a rich egg-and-cheese covering.

Truly excellent meal: if you find yourself in Berlin, check it out...

jducoeur: (Default)

Another vacation, another set of impressionistic diary entries...

Traveling on Icelandair is proving to be a mixed bag. On the up side, the airfare was fairly low. On the downside, Reykjavik airport is a cold stop, especially when they ask you to exit right on the tarmac.

TIL that in Europe, exit-row seats apparently don't allow you to put your bag under the seat in front of you, spoiling an otherwise brilliant plan for a comfortable ride. And they put hard barriers between the seats, preventing the usual armrest-up cuddling. That said, nobody bought the window seat, so we were able to take the aisle and window seats, and have elbow room between us for our desperate attempt at a little red-eye sleep.

Our taxi ride from the airport to our hotel was fairly uneventful most of the way -- until we got to the main street, where there was a large (apparently right-wing) protest parade flanked by many (apparently left-wing) counter-protesters. Police had blocked the entire road: there was, reportedly, No Way To Get There From Here. So we paid our very-apologetic taxi driver, found a pedestrian-sized gap in the protesters, and lugged our suitcases via the kilometer of cobblestones the rest of the way. (Really, it would have been a perfectly nice walk except that big cobblestones and little suitcase wheels don't really get along.)

Not long after getting to the hotel, I started developing an unsettlingly ghastly pain in my right flank, somewhere around my kidney. Now, this is not the first time this has happened -- I remember it once on a previous flight, and Kate thinks this is the third time. Always during or after a flight, so kidney stones seems an unlikely explanation. But it was pretty horrible: only a level 4-5 pain, but absolutely unrelenting for several hours, enough to have me in tears at times. Whenever something like that happens, it drives home to me how people can wind up with opioid addictions and the like: when pain is that sort of constant, you'll do almost anything to get it to stop.

It wasn't until a while after Kate wandered off for dinner (leaving me to lie down and try to relax) that the edge of nausea finally turned into vomiting -- which, oddly, immediately sharply reduced the pain.

Kate's pet theory is that I eat horribly during and around flights (which is true), and my digestion is rebelling. My pet theory is that my belt pouch is digging into my side and causing some sort of internal bruising. We'll probably try to avoid both, and hopefully this will stop happening.

I spent much of the evening panicking about finding a proper power adapter. The front desk had plug adapters, to go from European-style to American-style, but those don't deal with the voltage adjustment; having looked up the topic the other day, I was all worried about that. Finally, in the middle of the night (once the pain had died down), my brain started working enough to remember that both my CPAP and laptop have transformer power bricks; looking at those more carefully demonstrated that both are perfectly content with European voltages, so I was worrying about nothing.

On the plus side, the Circus Hotel is absolutely lovely: not insanely expensive, and quite pleasantly decorated and equipped. I feel much too old to be staying here (the lobby is packed full of young hipsters), but our Junior Suite is reasonably roomy, all very new and shiny, and the area is right up our alley, packed with restaurants and shops. Service here is very friendly and helpful, contradicting stereotypes of German service, and everybody here speaks excellent English. (I am reminded that one of my subtler privileges is being a native speaker of the modern lingua franca.)

Hawaii

Nov. 20th, 2017 03:37 pm
jducoeur: (Default)

[Kate has given me permission to repost her diary notes from our recent vacation here, since she is good about taking detailed notes and I am... not. The following is mostly hers, plus a bit of formatting and relevant links; my additions are in italicized square brackets, like this. Also, note that I am linking to photos, as appropriate.]

So we're back from vacation, which was lovely. The short version is Hawaii is gorgeous, but Waikiki is now just a shopping mall and we like the Big Island much better, especially the Volcano Nat'l Park. And American is a terrible airline.

For the long version, including all 3 locations we stayed in Hawaii plus Disneyland and all of my reading/watching, Read on... )

jducoeur: (Default)

No shit, there we were, near the end of our trip to Hawaii. We were staying at this absolutely gorgeous cottage in Volcano Village -- unlike the rental in Kona, this didn't feel like a rental, this felt like somebody's house. (Specifically, somebody with great taste in furnishings -- one of the few places I've stayed that feels as nice as our own rental condos down in Sanibel.)

That last night, we were tired and just looking to chill out, so we decided to watch a movie. The place didn't have built-in Netflix, and I wasn't motivated to wire my laptop up to the TV, so Kate went digging through the rather good DVD collection. And the one thing she found, that neither of us had seen yet and both had on our "we probably ought to watch this someday" lists, was...

... Avatar.

Let me tell you, watching Avatar after spending ten days soaking up Hawaiian culture and history is weird, because the planet Pandora is screamingly Hawaii. (Or at least generically Polynesian.) This was particularly driven home by the close-ups of the flora, early in the movie, which left me going, "Wait a second. That fern is growing right outside our window here."

That said, it also drives home just how problematic some aspects of the movie are. I was particularly cranky about just how extreme a case of Great White Blue Savior it has -- that trope was well past its prime by the time Avatar came out.

Kate pointed out that the more serious problem was its severe case of Noble Savage, which I have to agree is kind of painful after, say, touring the Iolani Palace. One thing you get, when you look at Hawaiian history up close, is that these were not innocent savages -- practically from the moment of Cook's landing, they were aggressively learning, using and adapting everything they could extract from these new visitors.

Yes, there was some cultural imperialism going on, but you can't help but notice that the last King of Hawaii wasn't just aping European nobility -- he'd gone well past them in sophistication, after only a century or so. (First Monarch to circumnavigate the globe: check. Members of every Order that mattered in its time, including Masonry: check. First Royal palace with electric lights throughout: check. Indeed, the Iolani looks to have been a beautifully livable palace for its time.)

So -- on the one hand, the movie is trying to be anti-imperialist, which is an admirable goal. OTOH, being surrounded by some of the history that appears to have inspired it, it's a bit cringe-inducing.

(It is pretty, though, and I can see why it was a big deal at the time...)

jducoeur: (Default)

So yeah -- we're in Hawaii. (Kate declared years ago that that would be this year's vacation.) My usual smattering of observations.

First: I now have an Instagram account, in order to follow the in-laws, and I'm posting links to a few representative pix from the trip there.

Waikiki -- well, I'm glad to have seen it, but wow has it turned into a tourist stereotype. The main drag is now entirely expensive shops. The only thing that saves this from being entirely trite is that the target market is heavily Japanese, so some of the shops are a bit interesting, such as the underground Japanese food court with the hoji-cha soft serve. Weird and yummy is still yummy.

We took the morning tourist trolley out to Diamondhead, and hiked up to the summit. As mountains go it's pretty modest -- slightly steep in spots, but still a fairly easy and fun mile walk. Recommended if you're at all into walking.

The Polynesian Cultural Center was probably the highlight of our stay on Oahu -- thanks to [personal profile] ladysprite for suggesting it, some months back. I got lots of horrified looks before the trip of, "You're going to a luau run by the Mormons? There won't be any cocktails!"; we survived the lack of silly over-sweet booze. (Yes, the PCC is a Mormon project, and they do try to get you to take the tour of the Brigham Young campus, but they do take no for an answer.)

The luau per se felt a bit "safe" and Americanized, but the rest of the PCC was quite neat: little zones for the various islands, each expressing its own character. Kate volunteered me for the Tongan drum show, which was goofy fun, and the evening show was really great -- a well-thought-out story that gave each island a bit of time through a well-produced, impressionistic show. Overall, a fine day out.

Restaurants: we had two good dinners at the recently-opened Baku -- fancy sushi and the like, and some of the deadliest shishito peppers I've ever encountered -- and an absolutely excellent one at Roy's, which is apparently one of the old mainstays, but is managing to keep their menu reasonably fresh and the food excellent.

jducoeur: (Default)

No shit, there we were...

... walking around the annual Holualoa Coffee and Art Stroll, our last day in Kona before we head down to the Volcano. We pause in front of the bakery stand (which is doing the end-of-day "make me an offer so I can get rid of this and pack up" sale), when the lady standing behind me says, "When were you at Pennsic?"

So I explain "a fair fraction of the past 30 years", and ask who she knows in the SCA. At which point, the lady standing in front of us turns around and says, "Oh, my son used to be King of the East".

And so it is that we got to meet Sir Edward's mother and sister, randomly, while wandering around Hawaii. (Along with a wry observation that I get to see her grandson more often than she does.) Such is the power of a well-chosen shirt...

the dogs

Oct. 22nd, 2015 04:00 pm
jducoeur: (Default)
We of course ate out throughout our stay in Edinburgh, mostly at local restaurants in the residential part of town. (Part of the motivation for spending several days up there was visiting Kate's cousins.) Those were generally solidly good but unremarkable -- a good Indian restaurant for an adults-night-out dinner, a Scanadavian cafe for lunch with the kids (three small children will constrain the choices a bit), and so on.

The one really *interesting* meal was our last evening in town. We were on our own, so could experiment a bit, and were disinclined to wander back to the Royal Mile. (The area near Edinburgh Castle - scenic, but touristy, expensive, and a hard walk uphill.) So after poking around online for a while, we decided to try "the dogs". (Lowercase intentional -- yes, it's a bit artsy-fartsy.) The restaurant is on the Princes Street side of town, a few blocks away from Princes Street itself and around half a mile down from the train station.

The atmosphere is nothing too impressive -- it's a second-floor space, with old and worn tables, and tattoo'ed waitstaff in t-shirt. The decor is, as you'd guess, mostly paintings and photos of dogs. Basically, it comes across as a particularly bohemian cafe. But the food stood out as a notch above.

Everything was distinctively local tastes, with an experimental edge. We started with a salad of greens, green apple and a shallot vinaigrette, topped with whiting -- little roasted fish about the size of sardines. It sounds weird, but the flavors blended excellently, the savory fish balancing the sweet-tart of the apples, and the warm fish against the cool dressing.

Kate went for comfort food: macaroni and cauliflower with cheese. Simple, but perfectly prepared, with a luscious cheese (rich, but not the sort of chokingly thick bechamel that annoys me), cooked to a perfectly yummy brown on top. Far as we could guess, the cauliflower was lightly roasted before going in, so it didn't make the cheese watery (a common flaw in cauliflower and cheese); I'll have to remember that trick.

I decided to try the pork, which was the really weird win of the meal: a pork belly steak, topped with brown sauce, and a pear-cleriac mash on the side. On its own, the mash was weirdly sweet and a bit off-putting, but again the melding of the flavors was surprising and perfect. The sweetness of the pear balanced the salt of the brown sauce, and the lower-fat mash balanced the pork belly (which, as always, was pretty fatty). It was the mark of a really well-thought-out dish that it worked best if you always had a bit of each element in each forkfull.

To make it all the more satisfying, the price was quite good: we paid 47 pounds for dinner for two, including two drinks for each of us and coffee. That's probably $20-25 less than I'd expect to pay for a comparable meal at home.

So overall, a solid win. Recommended if you happen to find yourself in Edinburgh...
jducoeur: (Default)
[And now for the promised assorted notes from me]

Our hotel in Edinburgh was something I haven't encountered in the US: inexpensive without feeling cheap.

Motel 1 is apparently a German chain that is spreading around Europe, and has a very distinctive style. The best word I can come up with for our room is "spare".

It eschewed all the usual superfluities -- no pad of paper, pens, guidebooks and the like -- but went much further than that. There was no telephone, presumably on the theory that everyone travels with a cell these days. Nor was there a clock -- if you needed an alarm, you could set the TV to wake you up. (As we discovered the hard way our first morning there, when we were awakened at 8:30 AM by a children's show babbling in German with brightly-colored and rather abstract animation. As groggy as I was, the effect was rather trippy.)

It was very distinctly a bedroom, with none of the living-room trappings you usually see. Instead of a desk with a faux Aeron chair, there was a small table, with a stool underneath it if you needed. There was essentially a one-seater sofa. If you wanted more comfort, the hotel's lounge and bar is spacious, comfortable and open 24 hours.

(The only thing that felt slightly optional was the electric tea-kettle. But this *was* Britain, and one has to accomodate local tastes. And Kate quite appreciated it. OTOH, she was rather put out by the complete lack of any shelves on her side of the bed, which did seem like an error to me.)

All that said, what *was* there was very well-executed. The bed was solid, and more comfortable than average, not the saggy horror of a typical cheap hotel. The furnishings, especially in the bathroom, were fairly fancy Danish-modern in style -- probably not Kohler per se, but that sort of thing -- which suited the slightly Spartan approach.

And in return, the price was excellent -- 60-something pounds for a hotel room smack in the city center, across the street from the train station. (And the vastly more expensive Balmoral.)

All in all, I'd say the chain is a win, and a surprising one for me. I have an aversion to "economy" hotels in the US, precisely because I do find them "cheap" in the pejorative sense. Yes, I know my privilege shows here, but staying in a Quality Inn last month drove home why I don't do that: everything about it felt *chintzy* -- poorly-executed, old and decaying. (My go-to chain is usually the mid-range Hilton Garden Inn, which is the least expensive I've found that is reliably decent.) This was quite different: like I said, spare and inexpensive (for downtown), but nonetheless consistently high-quality.

Good stuff, and I hope the chain makes its way to the US.

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags