(no subject)

Date: 2014-11-13 04:18 pm (UTC)
jducoeur: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jducoeur
Then why should prowess with the rapier (for instance) be included in the Laurel, where prowess with rattan not be?

Because The Chivalry Are The Exception. That is, I accept (out of necessity) that the Chivalry simply don't fit in with any neat categorization: they occupy a weird and particular place in the SCA, and yes, they violate attempts to create a nicely consistent system. I simply throw up my hands at that, and try to work around it...
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags