(no subject)

Date: 2018-12-31 12:18 am (UTC)
cellio: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cellio
They'll just decide that the survey isn't worth the hassle and drop it.

Or decide that answering that question differently is more expedient. Placing any value in the results of that question would be foolish but, alas, consistent.

Lots of annoying questions there, with no "other" + textbox options. It's almost like they plan to stop at pie charts and bar graphs and don't want to actually read thoughtful commentary.

I answered "yes" to "are there enough peerages?", while also saying that those other areas deserve a path too. There was no way to express that the paths might be *different* for specific martial endeavors.

There are no questions about the effects of the order of defense on the Laurel, where we used to try to fit those folks in -- how did this change work out in that regard?

If they want to know whether membership has increased since the new peerage, don't they have the data to answer that already? Why ask us -- unless it's just to reinforce their "membership is the primary goal" mindset? (Which I suspect isn't working anyway. Are people taking this survey going to say "gosh, this *has* made things better -- I should go get a membership right now to show my support!"?)
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags