(no subject)

Date: 2023-06-21 01:51 am (UTC)
jducoeur: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jducoeur

Counterpoint: https://i.redd.it/bfk8au96slxa1.png

Fair, but the failure mode of anonymity is less "asshole" and more "endless stream of abuse". It's extraordinarily difficult to manage the levels of abuse that are possible with full anonymity, since it becomes fairly easy to essentially flood the zone. An identity -- even a pseudonymous one -- can be managed in organized ways. But true anonymity is sort of an undifferentiated mass, which is much more challenging.

If it was possible to build reliable automated tools to deal with that sort of thing, I might change my mind, but that's getting into essentially "trustworthy AI", and I think we're a fair ways from that being a valid phrase.

Basically, it's a management problem. So when I talk about carving out niches for anonymity in limited ways, I'm thinking along the lines of allowing anonymous posting in one's own DW -- an individual is taking responsibility for managing the consequences, and there is a way to cut it off when the bots discover it and start attacking in earnest.

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags