Apr. 21st, 2006

jducoeur: (Default)
Grr -- hypocritical politics gets under my skin. Today's issue is sex-offender registries, and all the hand-wringing about the way that they can be used for vigilanteeism. In particular, the way that advocates try to make the point that this is a misuse of the system: of course, you're not supposed to use these things for such purposes.

Get real, people: the entire point of these things is vigilanteeism. They are deeply grounded in the assumption that no sex-crime offender can ever be rehabilitated, so they must be monitored forever, and all their neighbors should be kept nervous about them. No, they aren't designed to cause murder -- but they *are* basically designed to make these people social pariahs. The government's message is essentially, "These are Bad People, but our hands are tied so we can't do anything more about them, so it's up to You, The Public." Of course that's going to result in vigilanteeism. The only real surprise is that it's taken this long.

Far too many people scoff at civil liberties as ivory-tower matters, disconnected from the complexities of the real world. What they forget is that most of those liberties were hammered out over centuries of social struggle and debate, and they all have very good real-world reasons for existence. The oversimplification comes when they are cast away too casually, without properly understanding why that social contract is there in the first place...
jducoeur: (Default)
Grr -- hypocritical politics gets under my skin. Today's issue is sex-offender registries, and all the hand-wringing about the way that they can be used for vigilanteeism. In particular, the way that advocates try to make the point that this is a misuse of the system: of course, you're not supposed to use these things for such purposes.

Get real, people: the entire point of these things is vigilanteeism. They are deeply grounded in the assumption that no sex-crime offender can ever be rehabilitated, so they must be monitored forever, and all their neighbors should be kept nervous about them. No, they aren't designed to cause murder -- but they *are* basically designed to make these people social pariahs. The government's message is essentially, "These are Bad People, but our hands are tied so we can't do anything more about them, so it's up to You, The Public." Of course that's going to result in vigilanteeism. The only real surprise is that it's taken this long.

Far too many people scoff at civil liberties as ivory-tower matters, disconnected from the complexities of the real world. What they forget is that most of those liberties were hammered out over centuries of social struggle and debate, and they all have very good real-world reasons for existence. The oversimplification comes when they are cast away too casually, without properly understanding why that social contract is there in the first place...
jducoeur: (Default)
I am ruefully amused at the hand-wringing of Opus Dei about their treatment in "The Da Vinci Code". Yes, yes, it's terrible that their organization has been subject to false accusations, and made to look like the bad guys in a work of fiction. But I find myself really wanting to talk face-to-face with the head of the group and say simply, "Hey, bubbala? I'm a Freemason. Your church spent centuries doing exactly this to my fraternity. Welcome to the club, and get over it..."
jducoeur: (Default)
I am ruefully amused at the hand-wringing of Opus Dei about their treatment in "The Da Vinci Code". Yes, yes, it's terrible that their organization has been subject to false accusations, and made to look like the bad guys in a work of fiction. But I find myself really wanting to talk face-to-face with the head of the group and say simply, "Hey, bubbala? I'm a Freemason. Your church spent centuries doing exactly this to my fraternity. Welcome to the club, and get over it..."
jducoeur: (Default)
[Friends-locked, simply to avoid telling the world that we're away from home.]

[livejournal.com profile] msmemory's mother passed away this morning, so we're heading to CT more or less right after I hit "send" here. We expect to be away, perhaps sporadically, over the next week; if you don't see us somewhere expected, that's why. We've both got our cell phones with us, and that's the best way to contact us for the moment, although we'll probably check email from time to time.

A particular note for tonight: Low Company *is* still on, over at Kobi's. I encourage folks to still go to that -- I'm hoping it gets a reasonable turnout. I wasn't going to be running things anyway, so me not being there is no reason to miss it...
jducoeur: (Default)
[Friends-locked, simply to avoid telling the world that we're away from home.]

[livejournal.com profile] msmemory's mother passed away this morning, so we're heading to CT more or less right after I hit "send" here. We expect to be away, perhaps sporadically, over the next week; if you don't see us somewhere expected, that's why. We've both got our cell phones with us, and that's the best way to contact us for the moment, although we'll probably check email from time to time.

A particular note for tonight: Low Company *is* still on, over at Kobi's. I encourage folks to still go to that -- I'm hoping it gets a reasonable turnout. I wasn't going to be running things anyway, so me not being there is no reason to miss it...

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags