Some thoughts on Twitter
Apr. 2nd, 2008 01:13 pmOkay -- having "followed" a modest number of people on Twitter, looked around some and started to get a handle on it, I'm beginning to get the idea. Thanks to
hakamadare, who I think accurately described it as having a prescriptivist/descriptivist problem that was confusing me. I'm coming around to the opinion that it's mildly interesting but marginal for the purpose that's often claimed for it -- micro-blogging, essentially -- but useful and a *delicious* proof of concept for CommYou for its *best* purpose: informal group conversation.
For those who are curious, here's a little initial analysis of the thing: both what it is and why it's interesting. Keep in mind that I'm still very much a newbie there, but I'm grokking it a lot better now than I did 24 hours ago. This is going to be pretty long, and in-depth. It's important stuff for me, because of what it says about CommYou, but is only interesting those who care about the whole social-networking/blogging space. So in deference to those who just don't care, here's a cut-tag:
( Read more... )
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
For those who are curious, here's a little initial analysis of the thing: both what it is and why it's interesting. Keep in mind that I'm still very much a newbie there, but I'm grokking it a lot better now than I did 24 hours ago. This is going to be pretty long, and in-depth. It's important stuff for me, because of what it says about CommYou, but is only interesting those who care about the whole social-networking/blogging space. So in deference to those who just don't care, here's a cut-tag:
( Read more... )