Mar. 28th, 2011

jducoeur: (Default)
I always hate mandatory expiration dates for passwords -- just in principle, I consider it a questionable policy from a security standpoint. Most people aren't good at thinking up passwords, and I suspect that they wind up with weaker passwords since they have to keep figuring out new ones.

That's become less of an issue for me in recent years, since I was introduced to a good mechanism for dealing with it: I go to my iPod, dig through my vast collection of favorite songs, choose a suitable line, and leet it a bit arbitrarily. Pure and consistent leeting doesn't help security much, since it's a straightforward transformation. *Inconsistent* leeting and abbreviation as I do it strengthens security enormously, though, since it makes the search space much larger. I'll leet some characters a bit randomly, abbreviate some words, transform some words into symbols but not others -- the result is pretty unpredictable, even to me. The result is a passphrase that's pretty easy for me to remember, but hard to predict even if you knew what song it was taken from. (Usually a pain in the ass to *type* for the first couple of weeks, due to the transforms, though -- it doesn't simply flow from my fingers since it isn't real words. Right around the time I completely get it into my fingers, it expires and I have to start over.)

There's only one problem with this approach: I have to remember the line that I chose, and I get paranoid about it. So the result is that, for the week after I choose a new password, I am *utterly* earwormed with the song I chose the line from. It's all I can do to keep from humming it constantly. Fortunately, I always choose a long I like, but it still gets pretty annoying...
jducoeur: (Default)
I always hate mandatory expiration dates for passwords -- just in principle, I consider it a questionable policy from a security standpoint. Most people aren't good at thinking up passwords, and I suspect that they wind up with weaker passwords since they have to keep figuring out new ones.

That's become less of an issue for me in recent years, since I was introduced to a good mechanism for dealing with it: I go to my iPod, dig through my vast collection of favorite songs, choose a suitable line, and leet it a bit arbitrarily. Pure and consistent leeting doesn't help security much, since it's a straightforward transformation. *Inconsistent* leeting and abbreviation as I do it strengthens security enormously, though, since it makes the search space much larger. I'll leet some characters a bit randomly, abbreviate some words, transform some words into symbols but not others -- the result is pretty unpredictable, even to me. The result is a passphrase that's pretty easy for me to remember, but hard to predict even if you knew what song it was taken from. (Usually a pain in the ass to *type* for the first couple of weeks, due to the transforms, though -- it doesn't simply flow from my fingers since it isn't real words. Right around the time I completely get it into my fingers, it expires and I have to start over.)

There's only one problem with this approach: I have to remember the line that I chose, and I get paranoid about it. So the result is that, for the week after I choose a new password, I am *utterly* earwormed with the song I chose the line from. It's all I can do to keep from humming it constantly. Fortunately, I always choose a long I like, but it still gets pretty annoying...
jducoeur: (Default)
I hadn't previously come across the New York Times' new web interface. Skimmer is based on HTML5, so it'll only work if you have an up-to-date browser (Chrome, FF4, IE9, something like that), but it's impressively slick: a smooth Flash-grade UI with a lot of clever ideas. I found it via this Times article on the rise of HTML5, and it makes a compelling case for why it would be great for folks to get up-to-date sooner rather than later.

I'm finding it deliciously intuitive -- a rare example of an old-media company that is showing that they are really *getting* the new medium. And it makes it more plausible that people might actually pay money to use it: it's a very nice way to skim the news and drill into it...
jducoeur: (Default)
I hadn't previously come across the New York Times' new web interface. Skimmer is based on HTML5, so it'll only work if you have an up-to-date browser (Chrome, FF4, IE9, something like that), but it's impressively slick: a smooth Flash-grade UI with a lot of clever ideas. I found it via this Times article on the rise of HTML5, and it makes a compelling case for why it would be great for folks to get up-to-date sooner rather than later.

I'm finding it deliciously intuitive -- a rare example of an old-media company that is showing that they are really *getting* the new medium. And it makes it more plausible that people might actually pay money to use it: it's a very nice way to skim the news and drill into it...

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags