(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-24 08:32 pm (UTC)
jducoeur: (0)
From: [personal profile] jducoeur
Actually, from the discussions on the LtU page, I believe that's more or less the plan. But it's not quite that simple: there are things that need to be standardized in the large language that are outside the scope of the small one. (Eg, Unicode handling.) And defining the "standard" macros and extensions is a huge task -- indeed, a fair fraction of Common Lisp is simply definitions at this level.

So yes -- I believe that much of the large language *is* simply a standard library. But since at least K&R C, that's been pretty normal...
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags