(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-26 11:07 pm (UTC)
That's entirely true, but my point in posting this was that life in colchicine-land was just fine, thenk-yew, without the trumped-up "concerns" in the blatantly spin-doctored press releases. Colcrys is colchicine, pure and simple, and now you get to spend about ten times as much for it as you did before. Yes, the approval process is expensive, but do you really suppose that entirely accounts for the price increase? No, it doesn't. It can't possibly. The price is what it is because it CAN BE. Yes, they were aided and abetted by an "initiative" at FDA to get grandfathered drugs through the Process (so expect a lot more of this crap in the near future). But the bottom line is that if you need colchicine, you now have to have to go to Colcrys to get it, and they get to charge whatever the hell they want. So they do. That's their motivation, not any concern for the public safety, which was not in danger and has not been improved one iota by this. And anyone who buys into their press releases probably still believes that cigarettes are good for asthma.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags