jducoeur: (Default)
[personal profile] jducoeur

I am a member of 1 clique of size 11

[livejournal.com profile] jducoeur, [livejournal.com profile] msmemory, [livejournal.com profile] tpau, [livejournal.com profile] learnedax, [livejournal.com profile] siderea, [livejournal.com profile] cristovau, [livejournal.com profile] alexx_kay, [livejournal.com profile] ladysprite, [livejournal.com profile] asdr83, [livejournal.com profile] dreda, [livejournal.com profile] shprintzah




Find the largest clique containing:

(Enter your livejournal username here).




No surprise here -- it's the same order-11 clique that [livejournal.com profile] siderea had wound up with. And oddly, while I've seen many order-10 cliques (and been in an astonishing number of them), I've seen very few order-11 and no order-12 ones so far. (Although the original posting claims that they've found one of order-57. Now *that* is a tight-knit group!)
From: [identity profile] vortexofchaos.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] rigel is in 6 of order-12. I am a member of 2 cliques of size 13:

I'd imagine that some of the DC LARP crowd might have even larger groups.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-07-07 10:17 am (UTC)
ext_104661: (Default)
From: [identity profile] alexx-kay.livejournal.com
I suspect that the clique size is also related to perceived LJ etiquette. I gather that, in some circles, if someone Friends you, and you don't Friend them back, it's a mortal insult. Such groups would naturally tend to rate high in this particular measurement.

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags