*God*, I love this project
Oct. 22nd, 2012 10:45 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm rapidly fleshing out the Querki Use Cases and Features. The Feature list is growing terrifyingly fast, but that's what the Use Cases are for: they are going to help drive which features get implemented when. (And more importantly, which features to *not* implement yet. I'm going to have to pick my battles carefully. Nothing gets implemented until we have a concrete use for it.) I'm starting to sincerely believe that this will be useful enough that people will buy memberships.
I think I'm going to start talking about Use Cases, something like one a day, over on the development blog (
querki_project). Please come join in over there, kibitz and comment, point potentially interested friends at it, and keep the ideas coming! The "what we're going to try to accomplish" train is rapidly gaining steam, and the project is looking ever-cooler and more useful...
I think I'm going to start talking about Use Cases, something like one a day, over on the development blog (
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-22 02:55 pm (UTC)It's going to be really important that we be able to have photographs (possibly multiple photographs) associated with each item.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-22 04:55 pm (UTC)How about a Requirements Inventory?
Managing requirements for IT projects is... OMG awful. The DBs that are out there are hideous, limited in functionality and expensive. As a result, most companies are effectively tracking their requirements through email and excel spreadsheets. There must be a better, more intuitive way. Someplace that allows multiple people to work on it at the same time. Some way to track which business area came up with what requirement for what system which matches what High Level Requirement or Scope Statement.
I think as you manage your requirements for Querki, you will see what I mean.
Managing Requirements for a Managing Requirements Use Case will probably feel pretty "meta" and strange, actually.
Did somebody say meta?
From:Re: Did somebody say meta?
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-22 05:36 pm (UTC)Closely related would be a dependency relationship, and a priority list. Combining the three together you get most of project management.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-22 06:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: