Reasons Why Monopolies Are Bad, #82
Feb. 22nd, 2005 11:48 amEvery time I am tempted to point out that Microsoft does sometimes get things right, they come along and prove just how very wrong they can sometimes get it.
I just tried to log into Windows Messenger. It informed me that there was a new update, which I would have to accept in order to proceed. Okay, saith I, this is fairly normal, so I press okay. It clicks, whirrs and hums as I keep working.
And then it reboots my machine. No asking of permission, no warning -- it simply shuts down all of my programs and reboots.
I ask myself whether these people have any conception of good UI engineering, and I'm forced to conclude that they probably do. They just don't care. They don't have to -- they're Microsoft, and they go where they want to today.
(Yes, yes -- I hear all of the Apple mavins snickering into their sleeves. We'll take the sermon as read, okay?)
I just tried to log into Windows Messenger. It informed me that there was a new update, which I would have to accept in order to proceed. Okay, saith I, this is fairly normal, so I press okay. It clicks, whirrs and hums as I keep working.
And then it reboots my machine. No asking of permission, no warning -- it simply shuts down all of my programs and reboots.
I ask myself whether these people have any conception of good UI engineering, and I'm forced to conclude that they probably do. They just don't care. They don't have to -- they're Microsoft, and they go where they want to today.
(Yes, yes -- I hear all of the Apple mavins snickering into their sleeves. We'll take the sermon as read, okay?)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-22 04:52 pm (UTC)Cause yeah, I run into that crap at work too, and it pisses me off.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-22 05:30 pm (UTC)Somewhat -- check out the SysInternals (http://www.sysinternals.com/) folks for some nice tools, most of which are freeware.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-22 08:06 pm (UTC)A lighter version of that is in SpywareBlaster (but it focuses only on spyware) and even lighter is the innoculation feature of SpyBot S&D
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-22 04:59 pm (UTC)I completely agree with you, Justin.
It's "Screw the customer" thinking.
Liam
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-22 05:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-22 06:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-22 08:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-23 04:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-23 04:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-23 04:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-22 05:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-22 06:34 pm (UTC)Undeservedly, in that they've no proof that Apple would perform any better if they were in Microsoft's position. Power corrupts, and all that. Comparing the current practices between Apple and Microsoft is... well, comparing apples and oranges. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-23 04:40 am (UTC)I like the products that Apple makes, and appreciate their innovation greatly - but insofar as evil corporate practices go, I think that were they in Microsoft's position, they'd be just as bad - or quite likely even worse.
Despite my constant irritation with Microsoft, I'm very glad that Apple didn't win its "look-and-feel" lawsuit all those years ago...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-22 08:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-02-23 04:04 am (UTC)Microsoft is a textbook example of the problems with monopolies: they *only* do good work when they have effective competition...