jducoeur: (Default)
[personal profile] jducoeur
Every time I am tempted to point out that Microsoft does sometimes get things right, they come along and prove just how very wrong they can sometimes get it.

I just tried to log into Windows Messenger. It informed me that there was a new update, which I would have to accept in order to proceed. Okay, saith I, this is fairly normal, so I press okay. It clicks, whirrs and hums as I keep working.

And then it reboots my machine. No asking of permission, no warning -- it simply shuts down all of my programs and reboots.

I ask myself whether these people have any conception of good UI engineering, and I'm forced to conclude that they probably do. They just don't care. They don't have to -- they're Microsoft, and they go where they want to today.

(Yes, yes -- I hear all of the Apple mavins snickering into their sleeves. We'll take the sermon as read, okay?)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-22 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metahacker.livejournal.com
Do you (does anyone?) know of any utilities that will let a user "take back" a little control of their Window$ boxes? E.g., that sits between the registry and everything else and plays traffic cop, or does the same for things like reboot requests/etc.?

Cause yeah, I run into that crap at work too, and it pisses me off.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-22 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asim.livejournal.com
Do you (does anyone?) know of any utilities that will let a user "take back" a little control of their Window$ boxes?

Somewhat -- check out the SysInternals (http://www.sysinternals.com/) folks for some nice tools, most of which are freeware.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-22 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com
Did you look at the home version of Previx? That does a lot for the registery, but not for boot requests.

A lighter version of that is in SpywareBlaster (but it focuses only on spyware) and even lighter is the innoculation feature of SpyBot S&D

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-22 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] liamstliam.livejournal.com
Finally, a technical issue I can comment on!!!!!

I completely agree with you, Justin.

It's "Screw the customer" thinking.

Liam

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-22 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] msmemory.livejournal.com
Hmmm. It prompted me to shut all my other windows (including Outlook!) before rebooting.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-22 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com
Consider GAIM, then. Or Trillian.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-23 04:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com
Mount a scratch monkey?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-22 05:56 pm (UTC)
tpau: (Default)
From: [personal profile] tpau
why? my apple laptop does this all the bloody time...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-22 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] umbran.livejournal.com
I hear all of the Apple mavins snickering into their sleeves.

Undeservedly, in that they've no proof that Apple would perform any better if they were in Microsoft's position. Power corrupts, and all that. Comparing the current practices between Apple and Microsoft is... well, comparing apples and oranges. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-23 04:40 am (UTC)
mindways: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mindways
*chuckle*

I like the products that Apple makes, and appreciate their innovation greatly - but insofar as evil corporate practices go, I think that were they in Microsoft's position, they'd be just as bad - or quite likely even worse.

Despite my constant irritation with Microsoft, I'm very glad that Apple didn't win its "look-and-feel" lawsuit all those years ago...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-22 08:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] doubleplus.livejournal.com
Yeah, this has always been one of my biggest problems with Microsoft's effective monopolies in various product areas -- not only do you sometimes get better products from their competitors, they do better work when they have competitors.

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags