Poll about Powerpoint
Jun. 28th, 2006 01:15 pmWe're having a discussion at work that has raised the question of how much Powerpoint is really used in the general population. Some have argued that a fair number of people are picking it up for personal use. I find myself a bit skeptical, so let's gather at least some anecdotal data.
Please take a second to fill in the following; even if you don't use the program at all, there's a checkbox down there for you. My flist is self-selecting, but it's also pretty tech-savvy, and it would be useful to at least get a sounding from this community. Thanks!
[Poll #757993]
Please take a second to fill in the following; even if you don't use the program at all, there's a checkbox down there for you. My flist is self-selecting, but it's also pretty tech-savvy, and it would be useful to at least get a sounding from this community. Thanks!
[Poll #757993]
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 05:29 pm (UTC)It is acceptable for making people communicate their point visually. It has some major warts during authoring, and allows certain types of boneheaded mistakes, but in general the easiest path in using it generates a readable slide: downhill usability. However, this fails if you want to, say, make a decent-looking picture.
It's the worst alternative, except for all the others.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:15 pm (UTC)I don't know if my wife will notice this but she recently had fun putting a presentation together for personal use. She used it to teach a dance she choreographed for her ME dance class/club/troupe. She included the music in the presentation and in slide show mode was able to time it so the slides would change to give the correct cue for the dance movement at taht moment. She geeked over it for a week or two putting it together getting the timing down just right.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:42 pm (UTC)One other point about it's use around here (and with our customers) - Powerpoint by it's general way of presenting slides suggests that each and every major point should get a slide, or that your slide show should be a direct correlation to the outline of your presentation. Everyone here follows that guideline.
But presentation classes suggest that you gear your presentation to the nature of the presentation and the audience - and not every presentation or every part of a presentation needs a slide. You can get more use out of your slideshow software and your meeting time, if you ponder what you really need, rather than this stock Powerpoint format.
I think every part of Powerpoint discourages you from thinking this way... and I can't remember the last time we had a meeting without Powerpoint. We've become so dependant on it that the slides have become more important than the content.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 05:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 05:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 05:39 pm (UTC)"Clubs" I suppose I could see, if you had to give presentations regularly and had a projector setup, but in MY club, I use a chalkboard and count myself lucky. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 05:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 10:43 pm (UTC)Ooo...
You know, that MIGHT actually work. She pays attention to things on a computer screen.
Well...my daughter does, too, but that's beside the point. ;)
--Colin
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:02 pm (UTC)I have used the Powerpoint program to create / manipulate presentation files. However, in all but a very, very few cases, those were merely test data upon which to operate, and not anything I actually intended to present to anyone.
My impression of its utility (mostly formed from watching presentations, admittedly) is that within its domain-space (presentations with an overhead display), it's pretty good at what it does, but that it constantly tempts people into using it when some other format (verbal-only lecture with written handouts, diagramming on a whiteboard, etc) would be better, whether due to the information being presented, the skills of the presenter, the audience to which it's being presented, or some other factor.
(I'm reminded of one of my favorite Comp Sci professors in college, who shifted from chalkboard-written lectures - in which he was incredibly dynamic and engaging - to projection-monitor based lectures, which while very useful for being able to program examples in realtime / save them for later reference, were quite tedious and dull in comparison to his former classes.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:52 pm (UTC)It's like a chainsaw. Yes, it can make you able to take down a tree in seconds. But if you don't know about how to use it or how to cut down trees, you're more likely to lop off your own foot or bring a tree down on your head. A lot of people (*coff* NASA, I'm looking at you *coff*) shouldn't be allowed to use PP. As such it's the tool of the devil. For people who know how to put together and put on a presentation, well, fine.
All that said, it seemed to me to be a pretty mediocre piece of software, with inconvenient and confusing interfaces and inconsistent metaphors. To squeeze any juice out of that lemon, not only do you have to know what you're doing with presentations in general, but how to beat a recalcitrant desktop app into submission.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:12 pm (UTC)I find the interface annoying enough that I bought a copy of iWork to get Keynote, so I can do presentations there, and save them in PowerPoint format.
That said, it beats the days when we'd spec slides in roff for a presentation, and get the proofs back from the graphics department weeks later.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:47 pm (UTC)PowerPoint Lite: all the functionality I need on the rare occasions I do, and Micro$oft gets none of my money--all nice and legal!
Here's the thing: if you haven't picked up on it yet, my Lady is totally blind. PowerPoint is accessible *from the authoring standpoint*. A blind person can *create* a PowerPoint presentation. In fact, she had to, for a grade.
But the presentation itself is NOT accessible. Period. For someone entering the Public Relations job-market, this is something we have sooo much fun with.
A coworker despises it even more than I do. He uses HTML and a CSS to do his presentations, and has yet to be called on it. (Former Army Signal Corps Geek).
--Colin
(who now does not use a single MS product that he has paid for--only the lawfully free things, and ONLY as a last resort)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 10:13 pm (UTC)Hey! So is mine! Maybe we should form a club :-)
Come to think of it, I think she had some similar PowerPoint experience when she was at UMassBoston. Off hand, I don't remember if she actually managed to create one or not...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 10:39 pm (UTC)I formed it some time ago--response has been disappointing to say the least, but now that you are here... ;)
--Colin
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 11:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 06:52 pm (UTC)Functions:
- when you're giving a joint presentation with someone on the other side of the country, it's a godsend. We thrashed out the outline and details of our presentations via Word and Powerpoint, doing final editing the day before the presentation, when we both were in the same time at the same place. We both scanned books, arranged info, and made slides, and then just unified the slides.
- bringing a memory key to the MidEast dance seminar this month was a godsend - no books, no ugly B&W handouts - just the pictures I wanted, the way I wanted to display them.
- it's not optimal - but with a grid for a Master slide, and using the various drawing elements, it's not a horrible needlework display diagram, and it exports to JPG and GIF for easy web posting. Have used this on handouts and personal web pages more than once. It's not an idea picture editor, but it's simple enough and painless enough that it works for basic stuff.
I often use it at home and work as a converter - it'll read many different image formats, and export to many different image formats... so when I don't have a more advanced graphical editor, I use as you would a pipe in a UNIX system.
Burn, PowerPoint, Burn!
Date: 2006-06-28 07:27 pm (UTC)"Power corrupts; Powerpoint corrupts absolutely." — Vint Cerf
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 08:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 09:14 pm (UTC)Powerpoint seems to weaken every presentation I've ever seen that uses it. It engenders bad habits in the presenter (e.g. reading directly from screens) and in the presentation (e.g. time consuming empty flash for transitions and making points). Important and key data tends to be lost in the volume and the sheer speed that people usually whip through slides. The sad thing is that it's now being taught and used in many local schools.
You've probably seen The Gettysburg Address (http://www.norvig.com/Gettysburg/index.htm) done as Powerpoint...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 10:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 10:21 pm (UTC)When Charles Stross was working on _The Jennifer Morgue_ (forthcoming soon from Golden Gryphon Press), he asked for input on his LJ about how Bad Guys with skill in computational demonology might weaponize a PowerPoint presentation :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-29 12:43 am (UTC)Wow. Talk about bringing coals to Newcastle.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 10:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 10:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 10:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 10:43 pm (UTC)please consider reading Edward Tufte’s The Cognitive Style of Powerpoint (http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint); it is considerably more compelling that the typical anecdotal anti-Powerpoint screed. in a perfect world, your employer would pay for your copy. :)
-steve
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-28 10:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-29 01:17 pm (UTC)Okay, I think I have to give on this one. While very few people seem to *like* Powerpoint, it does seem like it's permeating the general populace more than I had expected...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-29 03:39 am (UTC)For example, at my company, we used to have to call a phone number at the end of every day, to record our hours (the system's name was TES--Time Entry System). Everyone forgot to do it more often than we cared to admit. I started putting up one-panel slides outside my desk as weekly reminders. Some of my favorite ones were based on current events or "this day in history" inspirations. Example: When the Mars probe landed, I downloaded a picture taken from Spirit, added numerous aliens, a castle, rows of soldiers, etc., and explained that Mars was once a great empire, but they forgot to call TES. When a co-worker posted his honeymoon pictures to the LAN, I downloaded one and gave it a caption indicating that he was cutting his honeymoon short because he forgot to log in his vacation time.
I was taught PP by a colleague who understood the need to put creativity in his presentations, and I have tried to keep my own in that same spirit. When you can make a flowchart more visually interesting, the people who have to stare at it are likelier to pay more attention to the content and likelier to understand what the @#$! you're talking about when you discuss the project/proposal/idea/whatever with them on subsequent days.
Seriously, it's what you do with it.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-29 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-29 08:51 pm (UTC)And I know that's not Powerpoint's fault, but still, we hatesss it.