jducoeur: (Default)
[personal profile] jducoeur
Okay, this has to be one of the most amusing technology plays I've seen in quite a while -- it'll be interesting to see if it works.

Amazon is currently in beta with a new tool called Amazon Mechnical Turk. Those with a good sense of the history of geekdom will get the reference -- it refers to the supposedly intelligent 18th century chess-playing "Mechanical Turk" robot, which actually had a human hiding inside of it. And that's exactly what they've built.

The idea is that some problems are hard for even the cleverest computer program, but very easy for a person. So they've built a set of Web APIs that allow you to submit requests to an "AI" that actually has humans hiding inside of it. Programs submit questions to the Mechanical Turk system, including the question, exactly what they're looking for, how much they're willing to pay for the answer, and how soon they need to get it. People come in the other end of the system, pick off questions, answer them, and get paid for it. Amazon takes a 10% cut of each question answered.

Remarkably clever -- if they can get the economics right, they may well have hit upon a powerful new business. At the moment, I don't think they have the pricing structure right: sampling a few questions on the site, it looks like they're all paying 1 cent for questions that take about a minute for a moderately competent person to answer, so they're underpricing it by at least a factor of five. But these things will tend to balance out over time: indeed, I see a future enhancement that adds auction-like mechanisms for providing answers, which would get much better pricing structures quickly. (And probably time-adjusted mechanisms, where the price starts higher and drops over time.)

There are some dangers, of course. For example, this system makes it straightforward to implement automated captcha-breaking, albeit costing a small amount of actual money. Most spam factories are loathe to spend any money at all, which will reduce the danger here, but this system will tend to drive down that expense to something pretty minimal. I'd bet that Amazon will be forced to implement policies against such things.

Mostly, though, I'm hugely amused (if perhaps slightly perturbed) by the phrase "Artificial artificial intelligence"...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-04 02:30 pm (UTC)
dsrtao: dsr as a LEGO minifig (Default)
From: [personal profile] dsrtao
It resembles an API to Google Answers...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-04 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mentalgiant.livejournal.com
http://answers.google.com/answers/

$2.50 an answer - in as little as 24 hours they say. Satisfaction guaranteed.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-04 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gyzki.livejournal.com
"You realize those are artificial artificial flowers?" - MAD parody of "2001"

Yes, I should think it would be interesting to watch the economics shake out.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-04 11:20 pm (UTC)
laurion: (Default)
From: [personal profile] laurion
I did play with it a bit when it first came out several months ago, but it never stuck with me. I'll agree that there are definitely tasks that humans are still better suited at, but when I was trying it out the website was so slow that the economic incentives (very few of which got to be more than a few cents per task) still didn't justify the time involved. The tasks that did offer more reward at the time were essentially asking the users to fabricate positive reviews of various products so Amazon could stuff them into their pages. That notion left me with an unpleasant taste in my mouth...

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags