Having gotten the word from above that changing the company name would be a Good Thing, I've just spent a couple of hours free-associating possible names. I'm trying to stick to real words, rather than the usual dippy made-up ones or misspellings.
What do I find? Dozens and dozens of good possibilities, of which only about half are being used. And the other half are all being squatted. *Sigh*. They really have gone through the entire dictionary, and taken every bloody word. We may yet wind up paying someone blackmail for a good domain, or have to settle for something goofy...
What do I find? Dozens and dozens of good possibilities, of which only about half are being used. And the other half are all being squatted. *Sigh*. They really have gone through the entire dictionary, and taken every bloody word. We may yet wind up paying someone blackmail for a good domain, or have to settle for something goofy...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-05 01:15 am (UTC)You have my sympathy.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-05 05:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-05 01:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-05 10:32 pm (UTC)Whatever you do, be very wary of naming consultants. Some friends of mine were among the founders of a company known initially as "Arepa", which owned and used arepa.com. The "professional" management decided being named for a South American foodstuff was bad, and hired naming consultants. The naming consultants, for on the order of $50k, came up with "Into Networks". Note that "into.net" was taken and not for sale. But they considered this no barrier, and registered "intonetworks.com" — at which point the company's employees started calling it "intone tworks" and bringing their resumes up to date. It was dead within a year.
* Note: I didn't search the entire six-letter-dictionary-word space. What I did do was fairly sophisticated; enough so that I feel like it's too valuable to give away, I'm sorry to say.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-05 11:51 pm (UTC)