The Evolution of a Game
Jan. 7th, 2007 08:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The process of LARP writing is a fascinating mix of fear and exhilaration. Yesterday, I have a mass of semi-related characters, and I'm nervous about the whole mess. Today, after six hours of brainstorming and design, I have a game. Still need a few more plots, but every character has two so far and most are up to four.
Finishing casting helped a lot (the letters will be going out shortly). That finally commits me to which characters are going to be in the game, and that presented me with a neatly-organized matrix of characters vs. plots. (Thanks again to those who helped me figure out how to get the nested queries working.) And that, in turn, made it nice and clear which characters needed more beef, so I could focus on drawing the right lines in the web to fill those holes.
Which brings us up to the next step: writing the damned thing. There's a lot to write -- 27 characters in about six weeks. But that's reasonably straightforward, once the plot web is done...
Finishing casting helped a lot (the letters will be going out shortly). That finally commits me to which characters are going to be in the game, and that presented me with a neatly-organized matrix of characters vs. plots. (Thanks again to those who helped me figure out how to get the nested queries working.) And that, in turn, made it nice and clear which characters needed more beef, so I could focus on drawing the right lines in the web to fill those holes.
Which brings us up to the next step: writing the damned thing. There's a lot to write -- 27 characters in about six weeks. But that's reasonably straightforward, once the plot web is done...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 03:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 03:42 am (UTC)In general, though, I'm reasonably happy about the state of things: it's not quite as far along as I'd like, but by absolute standards it's in pretty good shape. And while a fair amount of the casting is a bit unexpected, I think I've given everyone as close a fit to their requests as possible...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 03:49 am (UTC)re: as close to...
Date: 2007-01-08 04:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 03:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 01:22 pm (UTC)Curiously, this seems to be one of those little facts that crops up again and again, with little common understanding of the phenomenon. On the one hand, it's the best way to build sim games: Looking Glass' games were built on top of a very sophisticated in-memory OODB, which gave us wonderfully detailed and flexible worlds, far more complex than most. On the other, I recently came across Eastgate Systems, who apparently have evolved a system for more-traditional story design and management that bears many striking resemblances to ProWiki.
But yes -- I'd be happy to schmooze on the subject. It's become something of a passion of mine in the past couple of years. (I really should have suggested it as an Arisia panel, but it didn't occur to me...)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 12:59 pm (UTC)Mwuhahahahahahaah!!!
*glee*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 01:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 02:21 pm (UTC)After the game, I'd be curious to know who the 3 most popular characters were for each gender...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 08:31 pm (UTC)IIRC, the most-requested characters were, no surprise, Gil and Agatha. (Indeed, there were an amusing number of, "Well, I guess everyone's going to ask for Agatha, so I won't bother".) A whole bunch of guys asked for Klaus and a fair number for Krosp; among the women there were a number for Lucrezia and a smattering among the other good character roles like Von Pinn and DuPree.
But by *far*, the most requested characters were the Jaegermonsters. Usually not specific ones (although there were a few), but I think there were around ten people whose first choice was a Jaeger...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 08:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 09:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 11:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 11:30 pm (UTC)