Geekishness

[jducoeur]

Okay, this meme appeals a little too much to pass up, silly though it is. Here's my resume in SCA geek code:

SCA GEEK CODE. Version YF0305. >>
HF-ii AS+iii { BG+iv BC+i BR+o CG+iv CD-i CM-i DE+iii\+iv DI+iii\+iv GM+iv PO-i TP-i WC-i } SR+iii { AU' CL DM' KW' TE }
AR-i RA-i\+o CK+ii HD+i HS-i { C F L } MR-ii UN+i
A+i HW-i/+i G-i P.1603/+ii
EX.xviii/+iii TR-i/-i EN+ii HH-i FM+o MP+o NT+i WB+i <<

Comments

[its-just-me.livejournal.com]

Shame there isn't a translator on the site to stick you inside and read you in english.

[metahacker.livejournal.com]

still have your regular geek code lying around?

I'll have to add this to my info page, I guess...

TMH

[dagonell.livejournal.com]

I knew I'd hook you with this, it was just a matter of time! :D

I had considered giving myself +iv in games seeing as I've had articles published all over the Known World, I've been invited to give lectures, my stuff is available through the Society's A&S pages, etc. but it sort of felt like cheating to call yourself a +iv if you can't claim +iii

[jducoeur]

it sort of felt like cheating to call yourself a +iv if you can't claim +iii

Oh, I dunno. I think of the overall and specialty ratings as fairly decoupled from each other. I mean, I'm saying quite clearly that I'm better-known in dance and games than I am in arts in general, and I think that's reasonable. It seems like your situation is analogous...