jducoeur: (Default)
[personal profile] jducoeur
[Expanding on some thoughts I've made in comments elsejournal recently.]

Comcast has just made official what they've been hinting at for quite a while: they will be capping residential monthly bandwidth at 250GB. Needless to say, this is causing some consternation in the blogosphere.

On the positive side, they're actually giving a concrete number, as opposed to being vague about it, which is a real improvement -- there have long been reports of them tapping heavy users on the shoulder and saying, "Too much". If that's going to happen, I'd much rather have them saying publically what the limit is rather than applying it secretly and arbitrarily. And in their defense, 250GB *is* a lot of traffic: I'd be pretty hard-pressed to use that much with current technologies.

More importantly, the economist in me doesn't mind the idea of bandwidth caps. The notion of "all you can eat" is bad economics: by failing to set a price on consumption, it encourages people to be stupidly wasteful, and that will usually lead to bad results. By saying explicitly "this much bandwidth will cost you this much", it allows people to see what their consumption is costing, and to compare plans appropriately. In principle, competition should drive the cost-per-bit down to appropriate levels.

(And perhaps even more importantly, it's a move towards treating Bits As Bits, which is a healthier way to think about the Internet than trying to distinguish one kind of traffic from another, as they've been doing lately.)

OTOH, in practice there's a big snag here -- this isn't a particularly competitive market. It's not *too* bad in the Boston area: we've got three big players (Comcast, RCN and FiOS) duking it out in many towns, which is enough to keep them somewhat honest. But a lot of places have only two, which is dangerously cozy, and many only have one, which typically leads to things being more expensive than they should be. Even with three players, frankly, the market is smaller than I like, especially when those players have shown a tendency towards acting as a block when convenient.

So the situation does make me a bit nervous: in the face of weak competition, Comcast could potentially abuse their pricing power. The only reason I'm not *really* worried is the details of this particular market -- FiOS is the hungry new entrant into this market, and one of their best competitive advantages is bandwidth. (FiOS' network is in some respects much better than Comcast's.) I expect this to keep Comcast honest, lest they hand Verizon a big competitive advantage. But it's worth watching developments in this space closely, and it makes it even more important to fight against the industry's constant attempts to stifle new competition...

Straw, camel.

Date: 2008-08-29 07:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anu3bis.livejournal.com
I've finally had it with Comcast, only to find out that FiOS is going to be a long time coming and RCN doesn't service my area. So, Comcast is the only game, even though I'm in the middle Somerville. Still, I'm considering switching the Internet from Comcast's abysmal cable service to Verizon's 3MB DSL. Anyone know what the actual throughput is on this?

Re: Straw, camel.

Date: 2008-08-29 07:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crschmidt.livejournal.com
On my 1.5/384 line, I get 160KBps sustained down, 30KBps sustained up. (I think those are the numbers I pay or anyway, I only really pay attention to what I get, figuring I'm getting the best I can.)

Re: Straw, camel.

Date: 2008-08-30 05:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metageek.livejournal.com
It depends strongly on how far you are from Verizon's switches (the "CO", for "central office"). I'm something like 12,000 feet from the CO, and the best I can get is 384kbps. Mind you, that was with Speakeasy; Verizon might be less clueful about it, and try to sell you a 3Mbps line anyway.

I think broadbandreports.com will tell you how far you are from your CO, if you give them your phone number.

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags