jducoeur: (Default)
[personal profile] jducoeur
A bit of signal propagation, since I know that there are some teacherly types in the crowd. Lamba the Ultimate (a high-end programming site I follow) has a pointer to an intriguing-looking new publisher named College Publications. Their remit is apparently to publish textbooks for (gasp) a reasonable price, with halfway-decent royalties to the authors. Their focus seems to be in computer science and related fields (certain forms of math, logic and philosophy), so it doesn't help everybody, but it seems to be worth a look if you're teaching in those fields and want textbooks that won't break the students' banks.

More generally, I suspect this is the thin end of the wedge. There is little good reason for the outrageous prices of most college textbooks, and with the Internet and related technologies making publishing much easier, I suspect we're going to see a collapse in the business models of traditional textbook publishers. I'd bet that College Publications is essentially a clearinghouse with a skeleton staff that mainly focuses on vetting and editing, while outsourcing the actual printing and distribution. As such, they can probably do a reasonably good job pretty cheaply, and thoroughly undercut the traditional publishers. If more companies follow their lead, it *should* lead to prices falling to a more reasonable level. (Probably still not cheap, given the smallish distribution of the average textbook, but lower than current norms.) Clicking through their catalog, it looks like they're asking about half the price of the typical textbook -- that is, much closer to the cost of an ordinary book.

And yes -- some folks will point out that the Web may replace paper textbooks entirely. I suspect that's half-true: the rise of the Web will lead some people away from paper. But I expect a lot to hang on to paper textbooks for a good while yet, and this is a good middle ground. College Publications, to their credit, addresses this head-on: they don't assert copyright, and explicitly say that it's okay with them for a textbook to go onto the web once it has achieved profitability. Assuming they're honest and fair about the definition of "profitability", this is a very reasonable and realistic approach, likely to get the attention of authors in the field...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-10 06:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rosinavs.livejournal.com
The Web is already starting to replace some paper textbooks. I tried a Web and CD-Rom based text a few years ago that was horrendous. It needs serious work before it is usable. However, I'm using traditional paper texts now that have the entire text of the book available online for just the purchase of an access code, which is less than half the price of the paper text. For students who prefer having a paper text, they get the online access code for free with the paper text, so losing their text or having it stolen is no longer an issue. I like them because I do not have to carry two 10 lb texts home at one time. I just fire up the internet and go to work. Also, the online system has the same problems from the text put into an online format for giving online homework and tests. I hardly have to grade anything anymore, if I choose not to.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-10 07:13 pm (UTC)
laurion: (Default)
From: [personal profile] laurion
Even better, Wikis are now making it possible to 'crowdsource' textbooks. One class at Old Dominion wrote its own textbook, and were graded on it.

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Social_and_Cultural_Foundations_of_American_Education

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-10 08:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eclecticmagpie.livejournal.com
Actually, there are lots of good reasons for the very high price of textbooks. I'm not in the industry, but until recently a very close friend of mine was, and she would complain about the many issues. This may indeed be the edge of the wedge, but what will happen will not be that top quality textbooks become available for next to nothing, but that top-quality textbooks become unavailable at any price, and people complain a lot about how they don't make things the way they used to. Like software, the rise of the EULA and the death of lifetime free updates. Or the loss of top quality tech support from hardware companies.

Now, that said, some of the things that support high prices for textbooks are unnecessary. Another thing that will change is that the definition of top-quality will change (as it did with USDA Prime beef).


Much less than half

Date: 2008-11-10 08:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metageek.livejournal.com
The CP books are definitely less than half the typical textbook price. I don't think I've had any texts in my MS program that listed for less than $70; and I had one that listed for $140. I went online and found a used international edition (read: "paperback for countries that can't afford $140") for $40. The CP book I'm interested in, on Haskell, is $22.50 at Amazon, which is less than any of the less-academic Haskell books.

And that pretty well explains the sharp rise in textbook prices lately: when the Internet makes the used market so strong, a book that doesn't pay for itself the first semester never will. So the publishers raise prices, so more students look for used books (and more students have to sell their old books to afford new ones), and so the profit margin goes down some more, and the publishers raise prices again.

So CP is trying to break the cycle, and sell textbooks so cheaply the used market can't compete. I'm tempted to buy their Haskell text, just to support them. (I've already found a PDF at the authors' Web site, but I'm not about to print out 449 pages.)

Re: Haskell

Date: 2008-11-11 12:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hudebnik.livejournal.com
I've only learned the slightest smattering of Haskell, in the process of teaching "Principles of Programming Languages" last spring using this textbook, whose author decided publishers were just too much trouble to deal with, and he would just put his book on the Web. It's not a Haskell textbook -- about 90% of it is in Scheme -- but he does one chapter of Haskell to demonstrate the benefits of lazy evaluation.

Re: Much less than half

Date: 2008-11-11 01:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metageek.livejournal.com
Oh, it's not that altruistic; if it's a good Haskell book, then it's probably worth it. The smidgen of altruism is buying it instead of just reading the PDF.

I'll probably read a bunch of the PDF first to find out, though. It's not what you'd ordinarily expect a Haskell text to be; it's a text on mathematical reasoning, using Haskell as a tool. As such, it may not get into Haskell's hard parts. (I have a very basic grasp of monads, but I'm just barely aware of the existence of arrows.)

Good timing

Date: 2008-11-11 12:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hudebnik.livejournal.com
As it happens, I spent part of today looking for publishers and contacting them with my textbook proposal; I have now contacted CP with the same proposal. Thanks!

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags