![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As I catch up on my blogs from the past week, I just came across this delightfully sensible article in Ars Technica. It's worth taking a look at if you're into tech, simply because it nicely gels a lot of common sense. Basically, it argues that Microsoft Word is doomed -- not for any of the usual reasons of being slow bloatware, but simply because the world has changed, and Word's fundamental underlying assumptions no longer make sense...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 06:15 pm (UTC)But I don't think Word will die until the technology in non-technology related businesses catches up with that in the computer world. I have no guarantee when I go to work in the morning that the internet will be up (Of course, if it isn't, that is another trick to print something out). And perhaps I am in the minority in terms of jobs, but virtually everything I write in word I do write to be printed. The stuff that I create is used on a daily basis, and might be edited year after year, but needs to be formatted in such a way I know how it will appear on a written page.
I long for the day when my work does not involve long hours spent next to a copy machine, and students can email me their written work (making it legible!) rather than handing in a hand-written copy. But until that day arrives, Word, for better or for worse, will very much be a part of my daily existence.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 01:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 02:54 am (UTC)What I wouldn't give to be working in one of those classrooms where every child walks into the room with a working laptop, & is expected to use it for meaningful work. That would be heaven. That might happen here within 5 years or so, depending on how the Maine program plays out. But it will have to come from the state--individual cities would never pony up that sort of money.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 12:57 pm (UTC)I do see a lot of signs of things moving in this direction, not least because it's often cheaper and more efficient to do things online. For example, there is a *lot* of momentum to move health care management away from paper onto electronic formats, driven largely by cost.
I'd expect similar things to happen in the schoolroom, especially with the cost of usable laptops going nowhere but down. This is actually a significant recent change. Three years ago, laptops were expensive toys that you had to think about buying, but nowadays they sell netbooks in discount stacks at Costco. Fix some of the form-factor issues, give them just a couple years' more power, cost reduction, and improvements in durability, and I suspect you have a *very* practical tool for the classroom, that only costs as much as a few schoolbooks. I'd be genuinely surprised if that wasn't common at least in middle-class schools in ten years or so...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-12 04:11 pm (UTC)http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10308013-75.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-13 02:46 am (UTC)