Make Money Fast With LiveJournal!
Sep. 23rd, 2009 01:30 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It's interesting to notice my own knee-jerk reactions sometimes.
Just got up to the announcement of the new LJ feature letting you put ads on your journal. (Basically, you can associate your journal with Google AdSense.) Intellectually, I don't have a problem with the way they're doing it -- it's strictly opt-in, and they're passing on 100% of the proceeds to you. In principle, it lets people make a little money, in a way that is very normal these days. (What's in it for LJ? It's a paid-members feature, so presumably they are hoping that bloggers who have lots of readers will find it worthwhile to pay for an account in order to make money off of Google.)
And yet, my gut reaction was quite negative: it somehow felt like it was intruding crass commercial reality yet further into the space of me and my friends. That actually surprises me -- I hadn't realized that button was there. Too many years of spam and popup ads have clearly made me resentful of them, to a degree that I find just a little irrational.
How about you? Positive, negative, indifferent?
ETA, since several people have asked in one way or another: I *believe* the scheme is that the ads won't show up when you read your friends page normally, only if you actually look at the person's journal. The reason I believe this is that they've also added a new option that lets you deliberately opt *in* to reading the ads from your friends view, apparently on the theory that it's a way to put a little money into your friends' pockets. I confess, I'm skeptical about the idea; it'll be interesting to see how many people turn that on...
Just got up to the announcement of the new LJ feature letting you put ads on your journal. (Basically, you can associate your journal with Google AdSense.) Intellectually, I don't have a problem with the way they're doing it -- it's strictly opt-in, and they're passing on 100% of the proceeds to you. In principle, it lets people make a little money, in a way that is very normal these days. (What's in it for LJ? It's a paid-members feature, so presumably they are hoping that bloggers who have lots of readers will find it worthwhile to pay for an account in order to make money off of Google.)
And yet, my gut reaction was quite negative: it somehow felt like it was intruding crass commercial reality yet further into the space of me and my friends. That actually surprises me -- I hadn't realized that button was there. Too many years of spam and popup ads have clearly made me resentful of them, to a degree that I find just a little irrational.
How about you? Positive, negative, indifferent?
ETA, since several people have asked in one way or another: I *believe* the scheme is that the ads won't show up when you read your friends page normally, only if you actually look at the person's journal. The reason I believe this is that they've also added a new option that lets you deliberately opt *in* to reading the ads from your friends view, apparently on the theory that it's a way to put a little money into your friends' pockets. I confess, I'm skeptical about the idea; it'll be interesting to see how many people turn that on...
really really selfish perspective.
Date: 2009-09-23 05:43 pm (UTC)Re: really really selfish perspective.
Date: 2009-09-23 05:53 pm (UTC)I have a permanent account, so I'm hopeful that I am immune from them, because they would annoy me greatly.
Re: really really selfish perspective.
Date: 2009-09-23 06:22 pm (UTC)That said, we have ad blocking at work and it seems to work on Adsense ads, so I likely won't see the ads while I check in over lunch. Just the rest of the time.
Re: really really selfish perspective.
Date: 2009-09-23 06:25 pm (UTC)Re: really really selfish perspective.
Date: 2009-09-23 10:25 pm (UTC)(Mind, I don't really expect any of my friends to turn this on: I suspect there's going to be a lot of cultural pressure against it. But I'm not sure I would see the ads even if they did.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 05:51 pm (UTC)My purpose in using LJ is as an extension or substitute for in-person communication.
I would object horribly if you interrupted a conversation with me to recite a commercial for Pepsi. It would bother me if I began to feel that the purpose of our conversations was to hawk Pepsi.
The subversion of motivations for human conversation into a monetary purpose, is disgusting.
We have a "friend" in common (who I no longer really like), who once convinced me that it would be really nice if a bunch of us "friends" booked some space together at a B&B for an event. Later, I found that his motivations were to get a free room, and that he was acting as a booking agent for the B&B. (He, of course, didn't mention it: the B&B proprietor mentioned it to me, because of COURSE I would know.)
It was at that moment that I decided this pseudo-friend had little worth as a person, to me.
We have reached a cynical age, and I despise things that increase our mutual cynicism of one another. The profiting from friendships is surely the height of that cynicism.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 06:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 05:54 pm (UTC)[If I ever find a way to completely block pulse360.com, I'll be happy...]
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 06:04 pm (UTC)Likewise, my reaction to someone using it would depend on what the journal/blog in question was - if it was a journal that was otherwise a basically personal journal, I would have that general negative reaction you describe. (One that I don't, by the by, have to facebook ads, probably because it's a free platform). On the other hand, if it was more commercial / topic oriented, it wouldn't bother me. Though I might then read it through rss vs. livejournal, because I divide my content that way.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 10:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 06:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 06:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 06:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 07:01 pm (UTC)Anyway, obviously, I don't care.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 07:04 pm (UTC)BTW, I know that in theory I could have edited my previous comment, but I don't know how.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 07:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 07:55 pm (UTC)(Another happy user of Firefox with NoScript, Flashblock, and AdBlock Plus. I very occasionally see ads, but it's notable enough when I do that I remark on it. It's been months since the last)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 08:16 pm (UTC)If someone I watch puts up ads, one of a number of things is true:
I block the ads. No problem.
I decide they have a different purpose to their journal than I do to reading it. Unfriend.
I decide that their content is worth reading even with the ads, just as I do for webcomics and other ad or semi-ad supported media.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-23 09:12 pm (UTC)