jducoeur: (Default)
[personal profile] jducoeur
... you notice the current checkin revision number is 32697, and a part of you starts wanting to time your programming just right so that you get checkin 32768...

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-09 05:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antoniseb.livejournal.com
Well yes, I do that, but I'm old. Kids these days probably don't even think of 2 to the 63 as a break point.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-09 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hfcougar.livejournal.com
OK, I'll bite. What?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-09 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rosinavs.livejournal.com
There were a few reasons to know that number when I was a CS major too, but it was only rarely necessary by the early 90's.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-09 09:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] evilnicola.livejournal.com
My comp sci professor in 2005 taught it as part of our week long study of programming history, but it was only really a quick mention.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-09 06:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rocksryan.livejournal.com
signed 16 bit integers!

omg it took me so long to remember! it was nagging me since I read it.

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags