jducoeur: (Default)
I was thinking this morning about my next car. I'm hoping that my good old Camry gives me a few more years, mostly because I have a specific car I want, that isn't available yet: an optional-plug-in Prius. That is, exactly the current Prius, but with a plug in *addition* to the gas engine, so that I can get the range of the gas engine when I need it, but can run off the plug for short-range commuting. (Yes, I know that you can retrofit this onto the car, but I generally feel more secure when it's built in from the factory. Toyota is working on it, but it sounds like it'll be a couple of years before it's ready for prime time.)

But that led me to wonder: how sure am I about the relative merits about the electric vs. gas? I mean, yes, there are oft-cited statistics like "120 MPG equivalent" when you plug the car in -- but surely that's a gross oversimplification. From an *environmental* perspective (I'm not talking about cost here), there are lots of confounding factors that have to be taken into account. For example, what is my electricity mainly based on? Wind vs. coal makes a dramatic difference in the environmental impact of my electricity, and finding out the actual percentages isn't simple. (Yes, I can tell the power company "I want green electricity", but that really is just influencing the mix, rather than giving me entirely greener-based power.)

Moreover, there's another oft-cited statistic, that half of all electricity is lost in transmission. I *assume* that the amount of loss is proportional to where I am, though -- that there's a big difference if I'm 1000 yards from the power plant, as opposed to ten miles away. (Physics types should please tell me if that assumption is incorrect.) But I haven't the slightest clue how long the wires are between me and the nearest power plant, much less how the other plants in the grid factor into that. Figuring out how much electricity is being lost getting to *me* is quite difficult even to approximate realistically, and I would expect that to make a significant difference in the actual environmental footprint of this theoretical plug-in car.

So I find myself wishing for a website that would allow me to give the location of my house, and which would produce a *realistic* estimate of what my electricity looks like environmentally. I have no idea what the business case for such a website would be (and heaven knows, I don't expect it to be simple to write), but with awareness of environmental issues on the rise it seems like it ought to have a market. If Google wants a next project for their "organize all the information in the world" push, that might be a worthwhile thing for them to tackle...
jducoeur: (Default)
I was thinking this morning about my next car. I'm hoping that my good old Camry gives me a few more years, mostly because I have a specific car I want, that isn't available yet: an optional-plug-in Prius. That is, exactly the current Prius, but with a plug in *addition* to the gas engine, so that I can get the range of the gas engine when I need it, but can run off the plug for short-range commuting. (Yes, I know that you can retrofit this onto the car, but I generally feel more secure when it's built in from the factory. Toyota is working on it, but it sounds like it'll be a couple of years before it's ready for prime time.)

But that led me to wonder: how sure am I about the relative merits about the electric vs. gas? I mean, yes, there are oft-cited statistics like "120 MPG equivalent" when you plug the car in -- but surely that's a gross oversimplification. From an *environmental* perspective (I'm not talking about cost here), there are lots of confounding factors that have to be taken into account. For example, what is my electricity mainly based on? Wind vs. coal makes a dramatic difference in the environmental impact of my electricity, and finding out the actual percentages isn't simple. (Yes, I can tell the power company "I want green electricity", but that really is just influencing the mix, rather than giving me entirely greener-based power.)

Moreover, there's another oft-cited statistic, that half of all electricity is lost in transmission. I *assume* that the amount of loss is proportional to where I am, though -- that there's a big difference if I'm 1000 yards from the power plant, as opposed to ten miles away. (Physics types should please tell me if that assumption is incorrect.) But I haven't the slightest clue how long the wires are between me and the nearest power plant, much less how the other plants in the grid factor into that. Figuring out how much electricity is being lost getting to *me* is quite difficult even to approximate realistically, and I would expect that to make a significant difference in the actual environmental footprint of this theoretical plug-in car.

So I find myself wishing for a website that would allow me to give the location of my house, and which would produce a *realistic* estimate of what my electricity looks like environmentally. I have no idea what the business case for such a website would be (and heaven knows, I don't expect it to be simple to write), but with awareness of environmental issues on the rise it seems like it ought to have a market. If Google wants a next project for their "organize all the information in the world" push, that might be a worthwhile thing for them to tackle...
jducoeur: (Default)
In honor of the day *after* Earth Day, I notice what's really going to be my challenge as far as being good environmentally: the air conditioner.

I have *always* worked in air-conditioned offices -- that generally follows from being in the computer industry. So today I am reminded of the one interesting problem of my new office. I'm set up in the great room, which is comfy and all, and allows me to be a bit social with [livejournal.com profile] msmemory when she's home. But it's also basically an Easy-Bake Oven, with windows and skylights and no attic above it. Once the tree next to it comes into full leaf that will help, but the fact remains that it's the hottest place in the house.

We've got central air in the house, so the temptation is always going to be there to use it. But I'd prefer to learn where my limits really are, and not succumb to that too easily. Experimentation is called for. Between the ceiling fan and the cross-ventilation, I can get air movement. I don't have to dress in office clothes -- when I'm working from home, shorts at work are a perfectly fine option. For *some* kinds of work I can probably retreat to the family room downstairs (which is always far cooler), although there are some network issues that make that only a partial solution.

It'll be interesting to see where my tolerance really is. I'm sure I'll still be turning on the AC when it hits 90, but it would be nice to keep it off on the 80-odd degree days like today.

(All that said, I may have to investigate ways to move the build server downstairs to the basement, since it's not especially happy in this heat...)
jducoeur: (Default)
In honor of the day *after* Earth Day, I notice what's really going to be my challenge as far as being good environmentally: the air conditioner.

I have *always* worked in air-conditioned offices -- that generally follows from being in the computer industry. So today I am reminded of the one interesting problem of my new office. I'm set up in the great room, which is comfy and all, and allows me to be a bit social with [livejournal.com profile] msmemory when she's home. But it's also basically an Easy-Bake Oven, with windows and skylights and no attic above it. Once the tree next to it comes into full leaf that will help, but the fact remains that it's the hottest place in the house.

We've got central air in the house, so the temptation is always going to be there to use it. But I'd prefer to learn where my limits really are, and not succumb to that too easily. Experimentation is called for. Between the ceiling fan and the cross-ventilation, I can get air movement. I don't have to dress in office clothes -- when I'm working from home, shorts at work are a perfectly fine option. For *some* kinds of work I can probably retreat to the family room downstairs (which is always far cooler), although there are some network issues that make that only a partial solution.

It'll be interesting to see where my tolerance really is. I'm sure I'll still be turning on the AC when it hits 90, but it would be nice to keep it off on the 80-odd degree days like today.

(All that said, I may have to investigate ways to move the build server downstairs to the basement, since it's not especially happy in this heat...)

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags