jducoeur: (Default)
[personal profile] jducoeur
... or does "Known World Rattan Symposium" just sound utterly dippy? I get this image of a bunch of guys passing around pieces of furniture. Surely there exists a better name.

(Okay, yes -- "Known World Dance Symposium" is little better. But I've been arguing for calling that "The Laurel Academy of Dance" for years now...)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-08 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] new-man.livejournal.com
I hate the term "heavy list" almost as much as "rattan". What we do is fight, or aguably "tourney". I would favor the Known World

...Fighting...
...Tournament...
...Chivarly...

...Symposium

Or maybe The Known World Symposium of Arms (KWS of Arts Martial)

But no one asked me

terminology

Date: 2005-12-09 12:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cvirtue.livejournal.com
Well, I'll ask you. Although they're good words, none of them would make it abundantly clear that it's not about fencing, equestrian, etc. How would you solve that problem?

Re: terminology

Date: 2005-12-09 12:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] new-man.livejournal.com
"Fighting". Fighting isn't Fencing or Equestrian or any of our other martial activities. KWFS.

Re: terminology

Date: 2005-12-09 01:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rickthefightguy.livejournal.com
Here in the Midrealm, they use the word fighting to mean either armored or rapier - mainly because saying fencing isn't fighting is mildly offensive. Of course, they don't use epees out here, and if you fight with something as light as a schlaager, they make fun of you.

But armored and rapier are the two main uses, I think.

Rattan Symposium is funny though! And I do like funny. I think its Irony, though it might merely be sarcasm...I can never tell.

Re: terminology

Date: 2005-12-09 12:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herooftheage.livejournal.com
The term I read in a book once that I tend to use is "playing at the batons". It was meant to convey practicing with sticks instead of real weapons. I seem to recall this as being a period usage, but as I have no idea where I read it, I must downgrade that assertion to "weakly possible".

Perhaps you should consult with The Boftist. I'm sure he must have some cleverly correct phrase.


Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27 28293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags