jducoeur: (Default)
[personal profile] jducoeur
Just got an email from Toyota that they are expanding the Prius family of cars. (To include a plug-in hybrid and a station wagon, both of which are intriguing.)

The byline is "Prius Goes Plural", and the cute hook is that they are taking a vote on what the plural of Prius should *be*. I voted for "prii", which may or may not be good latin (I don't remember whether "prium" is more correct), but sounds right to my ear.

Totally pointless, and we'll see whether they do anything with the result, but as viral marketing goes (especially to geeks), it's quite clever...

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-15 02:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] corwyn-ap.livejournal.com

Accoding to my dictionary, it is a comparative adverb, so doesn't really have a plural.

Perhaps what they want is Priimus?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-15 03:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] liamstliam.livejournal.com
But in this case, it's a proper noun, unsure of gender. What's the gender of the word for wagon?

I think you are right, Justin.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-15 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] etherial.livejournal.com
Depends on the wagon, Volvos are all male.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-15 04:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tomspisak.livejournal.com
therefore shouldn't the plural be pria?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-15 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rootedinsong.livejournal.com
Did you read the table?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-15 05:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] doubleplus.livejournal.com
I definitely like 'priora' better than most other options I've heard.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-15 05:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rootedinsong.livejournal.com
There was a [livejournal.com profile] linguaphiles discussion about it here. :)

Plural of Prius

Date: 2011-01-15 05:53 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-15 12:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metageek.livejournal.com
If it's viral, then maybe the plural should be pries, by analogy with vires, the correct Latin plural of virus.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-15 04:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rootedinsong.livejournal.com
That's not true. Vires is the plural of vis, which means force or power.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-15 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metageek.livejournal.com
<looks at other sources>...how odd. I wonder where I picked that up?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-16 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baron-steffan.livejournal.com
Several options:
(a) It has no plural, because it's not a noun (or an adjective or verb). It's an adverb, meaning "formerly, previously". So, incidentally, if the marketing wonks were shooting for something "forward" or "first" or "preeminent" they blew it.
(b) If you decide that, in this case, it's a 2nd declension noun, then the plural is indeed "prii".
(c) On the other hand, it could be 4th declension, in which case the plural is prius, but with a long "u": PREE-ooss.
(d) Or you could decide this is silly, it's English, and the plural is "priuses".

And by the way, it's "one Volvo, two or more Volvimus" %^).

Profile

jducoeur: (Default)
jducoeur

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags